TSM Q2 FY2022

Q2 FY2022 Earnings Call

TSM · Preprocessing Report

2022-07-14

Quality

100%

166

Turns

Speakers

Sections

Exchanges

855

Claims

Entities by group 50

foundry semiconductor manufacturer 1

TSMCcompany

sell-side analysts 14

Jeff SupersonRandy AbramspersonCharlie ChanpersonBruce LupersonCharles ShipersonLaura ChenpersonBrad LinpersonKrish SankarpersonSunny LinpersonGokul HariharanpersonBrett SimpsonpersonMehdi HosseinipersonFrank LeepersonRobert Sandersperson

company executives 1

Wendell Huangperson

process technology node 5

N3technologyN5technologyN4PtechnologyN4XtechnologyN3Etechnology

semiconductor process nodes 2

N2technologyM5technology

financial services 4

Goldman SachscompanyJPMorgan ChasecompanyCredit SuissecompanyBrookfieldcompany

end-market demand 2

HPCtechnologyIoTtechnology

advanced packaging 2

3D ICtechnology2.5Dtechnology

investment banking analyst firm 2

NeedhamcompanyUBScompany

soic packaging 1

SOICtechnology

instruction set architecture 2

ARMtechnologyx86technology

country market 1

United Statescompany

mobile connectivity 2

5Gtechnology4Gtechnology

performance metric 1

PPAtechnology

power delivery 1

super power railtechnology

semiconductor customers 1

NXPcompany

chiplet architecture 1

chiplettechnology

Ungrouped 7

C. C. WeipersonMark LiupersonABFtechnologyEUVtechnologyfablessotherAlteracompanyDDICproduct

REPORTING 89PROJECTING 82POSITIONING 182EXPLANATORY 54ANALYST 165

Topics 95

capex×46capacity×46gross margin×41process node×41inventory×34revenue×24fab×23semiconductor×17packaging×16demand×14technology×14growth×13depreciation×13substrate×13pricing×11guidance×10chiplet×10cost×9smartphone×83d ic×8

Themes 338

long-term×24u.s.×15growth×14n3×14specialty×12advanced×8outlook×8guidance×8cost×8quarterly×7cycle×7question×7project financing×7revenue mix×6tight supply×5leading-edge×55g penetration×5hpc adoption×5third quarter guidance×4adjustment×4hpc applications×4strong×4follow-up×4technology×4supply×3capacity planning×3revenue contribution×3q2 fy2022×3tool-delivery delays and capex pushouts×32023 outlook×3electronics device×3logic×3expansion×3fabless×3inventory correction×3high-performance computing×3target×3tool delays×3fourth quarter×3sequential increase×2inventory adjustment×2competitive position×2healthy outlook×2future growth×2tool delivery×2customer support×2volume production×2business outlook×2correction duration×23 nanometer×2next year framework×2disciplined investment×2timing×2overall×2profitability impact×2impact×2expected impact×2cloud service provider×2backside×2customer demand×2joint venture in u.s.×2dilution×2measurement basis×2soic expansion×2smartphone adoption×2revised guidance×2customer levels×2customer adoption×2abf×2support×2full-year guidance×2drivers×2sequential growth×1hpc, iot and automotive×1better-than-guidance with fx and cost benefits×1on equity×1digital consumer electronics mix×1quarter-end liquidity×1current liabilities×1working capital×1bond issuance×1turnover days×1days of inventory×1operating×1investment spending×1cash dividend distribution×1payable increase from issuances×1balance increase×1margin drivers×1second quarter result×1fx and cost improvements×1exchange rate assumption×1vs guidance×1sequential decline guidance×1inflationary costs and fx×1rising costs×12022 guidance×1future increase×1taiwan regulations×1near-term outlook×1second-quarter×1demand drivers×15-nanometer and 7-nanometer demand×1softening demand×1rebalancing×1preparedness×1consumer softness×1reallocation to end markets×1structural support×1competitive strength×1customer portfolio expansion×1macroeconomic uncertainty×1leadership and growth×1computation×1high-performance portfolio×1less volatile and more resilient×1process technology migration×1data center demand×15g smartphones×1automotive content growth×1structural growth×1delivery update×1delivery lead times×1spending timing×1supplier support×1progress tracking×1onsite support×1delivery prioritization×1customer prioritization×1wafer allocation×1improving conditions×12022 plan×1status×1ramp×1process enhancement×1smartphone and hpc platform support×1customer engagement×13-nanometer leadership×1large and long-lasting node×1n2 status×1n2 development timeline×12-nanometer transistor architecture×1performance cost and maturity×1performance and power benefits×12-nanometer performance×12-nanometer density×1industry-leading advanced node×1future technology leadership×1good×1third quarter raised×1drawdown outlook×1broad drawdown×1inventory destocking×1severity outlook×1business correction×1customer reduction×1reduction scope×1tightness×15 nanometer and mature-node ramp impact×1above twd 40 billion×1forward guidance×1next year outlook×1future opportunities×1annual outlook after pushout×1lower end×1full-year financial outlook×1investor perception×1dollar content growth×1shipment growth×1asp and product mix×1cagr outlook×1silicon content contribution×1shipment contribution×1asp contribution×1confidential×1edge device mix×1mature-node expansion×1size of expansion×1new build versus conversion×1demand source for expansion×1mature-node supply and demand×1mature-node and specialty×1new capacity×1application demand×1different this time×1edge devices×1higher content in devices×1correction outlook×1industry outlook×1base case×1historical comparison×1correction severity×1cfo response×1down cycle comparison×1burden×1days outstanding×1changed×1semiconductor industry×12022 growth unchanged guidance×12023 growth forecast too early×1correction continuing×1capital intensity×1rental model×1results×1macro slowdown and recession risk×1digestion at data center and high-end smartphone customers×1hpc excess×1edge demand×1edge processing×1resilience and volatility×1smartphone inventory correction demand impact×1high-end smartphones×1future demand×1q&a×1n2 density improvement×1large density increase×1density slowdown×1n2 migration×1n2 slowdown×1n2 capex×1density gain slowdown×1process node advancement×1platform strategy×1wafer scaling×1process integration×1scaling factor×1power efficiency migration×1platform offering×1market introduction timing×1reduction burden from lower power approach×1key applications×1arm-based vs x86×1key driver over next few years×1arm vs x86×1arm versus x86×1broad customer base×1x86 and arm hpc support×1x86 and arm hpc growth×1design exposure×1level×1company framing×1factors×1breakup×1gap question×1government negotiation×1customer pricing×1covid interruptions×1shared with local government×1business opportunities×1site decision×1subsidies and cost reduction×1reduction strategy×1reduction progress×1customer fab partnerships×1past deals×1customer restrictions×1customer base access×1current run-rate versus target×1forward dilution guidance×1n2 packaging×1tsmc packaging×1smartphone platforms at n2×1capacity expansion×1high-speed and power-efficient applications×1mobile adoption×1solutions for requirements×1multi-year guidance×1current-year guidance×12023 decline estimate×1capex trend×1analyst question×1new annual additions×1annual roll-off×1replacement flow×1higher next year×1second half×1key drivers×1key financial indicators×1inventory downside×1inventory risk×1customer correction×1customer destocking×1correction question×1correction underway×1capacity constraint×1capacity tightness×1broad portfolio×1wider adoption×1mix increase×1progress acceleration×13dic center×1adoption ramp×12-nanometer node demand×13dic demand×13dic business growth×1japan center×1japan materials and packaging advantage×1global supply leadership×1development center in japan×1ic×1demand growth×1substrate usage×1market discussion×1materials adoption×13d packaging×1partnerships×1commodity competition×1high performance computing×1demand versus fx×1run rate×1euv-related pushout×1tool-related pushout×1full year×1euv×1equipment×1delays×1details withheld×1pushed out×1pricing pressure×1foundry increase×1further increases×1correction risk×1company disclosure×1customer negotiations×1value-based strategy×1customer value×1value creation×1manufacturing challenges×1input inflation×1pull-ins ahead of price increases×1potential demand weakness×1customer pull-ins×1pull-in ahead of price changes×1pushbacks and agreements×1future support planning×1customer count×1n2 adoption×1process technology roadmap×1

Key Metrics 72

gross margin×44capacity×33capital expenditure×27capex×25revenue×23inventory×21demand×12cost×12depreciation×12revenue growth×11growth×10costs×6silicon content×5density×5adoption×5profitability×4cagr×4adoption rate×4tax rate×3inventory levels×3capacity utilization×3volume production×3revenue contribution×3outlook×3penetration×3operating margin×2capital expenditures×2wafer capacity×2ramp×2dollar content growth×2operating cash flow×2penetration rate×2dilution×2price×2pricing×2customers×2earnings per share×1return on equity×1cash and marketable securities×1current liabilities×1accounts payable×1long-term interest-bearing debt×1corporate bonds×1accounts receivable turnover days×1cash from operations×1dividend×1bonds payable×1cash balance×1silicon content growth×1wafer demand×1lead time×1capacity plan×1yield×1customer engagement×1speed×1underutilization×1inventory correction×1asp×1supply and demand×1cycle×1correction×1free cash flow×1logic density gain×1density gain×1cost differential×1utilization rate×1earnings×1mix×1progress×1substrate×1guidance×1wafer shipments×1

Entities 1121

TSMC×495C. C. Wei×98Wendell Huang×74Jeff Su×59N3×33N2×27Mark Liu×26Randy Abrams×23Charlie Chan×21Bruce Lu×18Charles Shi×17Goldman Sachs×16Laura Chen×16Brad Lin×16Krish Sankar×16Sunny Lin×153D IC×15Gokul Hariharan×14HPC×13Brett Simpson×12SOIC×12Needham×11Mehdi Hosseini×11United States×8ARM×6Frank Lee×6x86×5Robert Sanders×5JPMorgan Chase×4IoT×3N5×2N4P×2N4X×25G×2ABF×2EUV×2M5×14G×1PPA×1N3E×1Credit Suisse×1UBS×1fabless×1Brookfield×1super power rail×1Altera×1NXP×1chiplet×1DDIC×12.5D×1

Business Segments 61

Foundry×24Wafer Fabrication×21Advanced Packaging×7High Performance Computing×6Internet of Things×1Automotive×1Digital Consumer Electronics×1

Sectors 76

smartphone×19high performance computing×16semiconductor foundry×10automotive×5cloud computing×5semiconductor packaging×5data center×4internet of things×2consumer electronics×2edge computing×2telecommunications×2personal computing×1project finance×1construction×1supply chain×1

Regions 39

U.S.×28Japan×7Taiwan×3Arizona×1

Metadata Distributions

Sentiment

positive 99negative 50neutral 423

Temporality

backward 63forward 149current 360

Certainty

definitive 99confident 140moderate 142tentative 188speculative 3

Magnitude

major 80moderate 326minor 166

Direction

improvement 40decline 20flat 2mixed 8none 502

Time Horizon

immediate 59near_term 223medium_term 89long_term 31unspecified 170

Verifiability

quantitative 124event 22qualitative 426

Analyst Intent

probing 57challenging 5confirming 19seeking_detail 74seeking_guidance 10

Speakers

Executives

CWC. C. WeiCEOMLMark LiuexecutiveWHWendell HuangCFO

Analysts

BLBrad LinanalystBSBrett SimpsonanalystBLBruce LuanalystCSCharles ShianalystCCCharlie ChananalystFLFrank LeeanalystGHGokul HariharananalystKSKrish SankaranalystLCLaura ChenanalystMHMehdi HosseinianalystRARandy AbramsanalystRSRobert SandersanalystSLSunny Linanalyst

Other

JSJeff SuirOPOperatoroperator

Sections

Type	Label	Speaker
preamble	Preamble	Jeff Su
prepared_remarks	Prepared Remarks	C. C. Wei, Wendell Huang
qa_session	Q&A Session	—
closing_remarks	Closing Remarks	Jeff Su

Q&A Exchanges 14

#	Analyst	Firm	Turns
1	RARandy Abrams	Credit Suisse	15
2	BLBruce Lu	Goldman Sachs	13
3	SLSunny Lin	UBS	12
4	GHGokul Hariharan	JPMorgan	9
5	BSBrett Simpson	Arete Research	16
6	CCCharlie Chan	Morgan Stanley	15
7	LCLaura Chen	KGI Group	14
8	GHGokul Hariharan	JPMorgan	10
9	CSCharles Shi	Needham and Company	12
10	MHMehdi Hosseini	Susquehanna International	15
11	BLBrad Lin	Bank of America	8
12	KSKrish Sankar	Cowen & Company	8
13	FLFrank Lee	HSBC	9
14	RSRobert Sanders	Deutsche Bank	6

Claim Taxonomy 572

REPORTING89

resultFinancial outcome for a completed period50

metricNon-financial quantitative fact22

operationalDiscrete completed event17

PROJECTING82

guidanceQuantitative expectation with number + time62

commitmentPromise with binary verifiable outcome15

targetLong-term aspirational quantitative goal5

POSITIONING182

strategyPriority, direction, or initiative139

competitiveCompany's position or advantages8

opportunityMarket condition framed as growth driver13

riskHeadwind, constraint, or uncertainty22

EXPLANATORY54

attributionWhy a specific outcome happened3

contextNon-company macro/industry fact51

FRAMING0

thesisFalsifiable belief about how the world works0

ANALYST165

questionInterrogative seeking information111

observationRestates a fact or data point34

concernFlags a risk or challenge4

estimateAnalyst's own projection or calculation6

sentimentOpinion, praise, or critique10

Field Guide

TopicWhat the claim is about — a short phrase used to group claims across quarters

ThemeBroad strategic dimension (e.g. profitability, innovation, market expansion)

MetricThe primary financial or operational metric referenced (e.g. revenue, gross margin)

TemporalityTime direction: backward (completed fact), forward (expectation), current (ongoing trend), timeless (universal truth)

VerifiabilityHow checkable: quantitative (contains a number), event (binary outcome), qualitative (subjective)

SentimentDirectional sentiment: positive, negative, neutral, or mixed

CertaintyHow hedged: definitive (fact) → confident → moderate → tentative → speculative

MagnitudeInvestment-thesis impact: major (concrete number + newsworthy), moderate (one of the two), minor (neither). Derived from Has Number and Newsworthy flags.

Has NumberWhether the claim contains a specific number or quantified result

NewsworthyWhether this would appear in a financial news headline

DirectionComparison direction: improvement, decline, flat, mixed, or none

Time HorizonHow far forward: immediate (current quarter), near_term (1-2 Qs), medium_term (1-3 yrs), long_term (3+ yrs), unspecified

Analyst IntentWhat the analyst seeks (Q&A only): probing, challenging, confirming, seeking_detail, seeking_guidance

EntitiesTyped named entities — each has a type: person, company, product, technology, event, or other

SegmentsBusiness segments referenced (e.g. Data Center, Gaming)

SectorsIndustry sectors (GICS/NAICS standard names) — excludes company division names

RegionsGeographic regions explicitly referenced

NumbersSpecific figures extracted from the claim text

TimeTime references anchoring the claim to a period

BoilerplateWhether the claim is boilerplate/formulaic language (dimmed in transcript)

FeaturesSix independent dimensions used to classify each executive claim: time_reference — when does this refer to? (completed: past fact, forward: expectation/plan, ongoing: present trend). content_nature — what type of information? (financial_figure: revenue/margin/EPS, quantitative_fact: non-financial number, named_event: launch/partnership/milestone, external_fact: market/industry info, company_framing: strategy/positioning). comparison_type — is a comparison being made? (vs_named: against a named alternative, superlative: best/first/only claim, none). company_valence — how does this affect the company? (tailwind: positive, headwind: negative, neutral). has_causal_link — does this explain why a business outcome happened? (true / false). reports_financial_outcome — does this report an actual financial result or projection? (true / false). For analyst claims, a single feature: analyst_action (asking, restating, challenging, projecting, evaluating). Together, these features determine the claim type.

Transcript

Preamble

Jeff SuirTSMC

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to TSMC's Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. This is Jeff Su, TSMC's Director of Investor Relations and your host for today. To prevent the spread of COVID-19, TSMC is hosting our earnings conference call via live audio webcast through the company's website at www.tsmc.com, where you can also download the earnings release materials. If you are joining us through the conference call, your dial-in lines are in listen-only mode. The format for today's event will be as follows.

First, TSMC's Vice President and CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, will summarize our operations in the second quarter 2022, followed by our guidance for the third quarter 2022. Afterwards, Mr. Huang and TSMC's CEO, Dr. C.C. Wei, will jointly provide the company's key messages. Then TSMC's Chairman, Dr. Mark Liu, will host the Q&A session, where all three executives will entertain your questions. As usual, I would like to remind everybody that today's discussions may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to the safe harbor notice that appears on our press release. And now I would like to turn the call over to TSMC's CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, for the summary of operations and the current quarter guidance.

Prepared Remarks

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Thank you, Jeff. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today.

My presentation will start with financial highlights for the second quarter 2022. After that, I will provide the guidance for the third quarter. Second quarter revenue increased 8.8% sequentially in NT or 3.4% in U.S. dollars, as our second quarter business was supported by strong HPC, IoT and automotive-related demand. Second quarter gross margin increased 3.5 percentage points sequentially to 59.1%, slightly ahead of our guidance, as we enjoyed a more favorable foreign exchange rate, cost improvement and value selling. Likewise, operating margin increased 3.5 percentage points sequentially to 49.1%, in line with our gross margin increase. Overall, our second quarter EPS was TWD 9.14 and ROE was 39.4%.

Now let's move on to revenue by technology. 5-nanometer process technology contributed 21% of wafer revenue in the second quarter while 7-nanometer accounted for 30%. Advanced technologies, which are defined as 7-nanometer and below, accounted for 51% of wafer revenue. Moving on to revenue contribution by platform.

All six platforms increased in the second quarter. Smartphone increased 3% quarter-over-quarter to account for 38% of our second quarter revenue. HPC increased 13% to account for 43%. IoT increased 14% to account for 8%. Automotive increased 14% to account for 5%. And digital consumer electronics increased 5% to account for 3%.

Moving on to the balance sheet. We ended the second quarter with cash and marketable securities of TWD1.4 trillion. On the liability side, current liabilities increased by TWD 22 billion, mainly due to the increase of TWD 47 billion in accounts payable, partially offset by the decrease of TWD 29 billion in short-term loans. Long-term interest-bearing debts increased by TWD 124 billion, mainly as we raised TWD 109 billion of corporate bonds during the quarter. On financial ratios, accounts receivable turnover days decreased one day to 37 days while days of inventory increased seven days to 95 days as we prebuild M5 wafers and increased raw materials inventory. Now let me make a few comments on cash flow and CapEx. During the second quarter, we generated about TWD 339 billion in cash from operations, spent TWD 218 billion in CapEx and distributed TWD 71 billion for third quarter '21 cash dividend. Bonds payable increased by TWD 109 billion as a result of this quarter's bond issuances. Overall, our cash balance increased by TWD 102 billion to TWD 1.3 trillion at the end of the quarter. In U.S. dollar terms, our second quarter capital expenditures totaled $7.34 billion. I have finished my financial summary.

Now let's turn to our current quarter guidance. Based on the current business outlook, we expect our third quarter revenue to be between $19.8 billion and $20.6 billion, which represents a 11.2% sequential increase at the midpoint. Based on the exchange rate assumption of $1 to TWD 29.7, gross margin is expected to be between 57.5% and 59.5%, operating margin between 47% and 49%. This concludes my financial presentation.

Now let me turn to our key messages. I will start by making some comments on our second quarter and third quarter profitability. As a reminder, six factors determine TSMC's profitability: leadership technology development and ramp up, pricing, cost, capacity utilization, technology mix and foreign exchange rate. Compared to first quarter, our second quarter gross margin increased by 350 basis points sequentially to 59.1%, mainly due to a more favorable foreign exchange rate, cost improvement and value selling. Compared to our second quarter guidance, our actual gross margins exceeded the high end of the range provided 3-month ago as our guidance was based on exchange rate assumption of $1 to TWD 28.8 whereas the actual second quarter exchange rate was $1 to TWD 29.42. This created about 90 basis point difference in our actual second quarter gross margin versus our original guidance. We have just guided our third quarter gross margin to decline 60 basis points sequentially to 58.5% at the midpoint, as a slightly more favorable exchange rate assumption will be more than offset by higher inflationary costs, including higher raw material and electricity costs. Looking ahead on our profitability, we will face challenges from rising inflationary costs from raw materials, utilities and tools, increasing process complexity of leading nodes, new investments in mature nodes and overseas fab expansions. Despite the manufacturing cost challenges, and excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate, of which we have no control over, taking the other 5 factors into consideration, we continue to believe a long-term gross margin of 53% and higher is achievable.

Next, let me talk about our effective tax rate. For 2022, we expect our tax rate to be between 10% and 11%. Starting in 2023, we will see the expiration of certain tax exemptions in Taiwan, and our effective tax rate will increase. However, Taiwan government is in the process of drafting certain new tax exemption regulations and is currently in the common period. Therefore, we will provide a further update on the outlook of our tax rate in 2023 and beyond when more details become available. Now let me turn the microphone over to C.C.

result#5

strategy#6

result#7

result#8

result#9

result#10

result#11

metric#12

metric#13

metric#14

#15

operational#16

result#17

result#18

result#19

result#20

result#21

#22

result#23

result#24

result#25

result#26

result#27

metric#28

metric#29

#30

result#31

result#32

result#33

result#34

result#35

result#36

#37

#38

guidance#39

guidance#40

guidance#41

guidance#42

#43

#44

#45

strategy#46

result#47

result#48

result#49

result#50

guidance#51

guidance#52

risk#53

guidance#54

#55

guidance#56

guidance#57

context#58

guidance#59

#60

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Thank you, Wendell. We hope everybody is staying safe and healthy during this time. First, let me start with our near-term growth outlook. We concluded our second quarter with revenue of TWD 534 billion or $18.2 billion, supported by HPC, IoT and automotive-related demand. Moving into third quarter 2022, we expect our business to be supported by continued demand for our industry-leading 5-nanometer and 7-nanometer technologies. On the inventory side, due to the softening device momentum in smartphone, PC and consumer end market segments, we observe the supply chain is already taking action and expect inventory level to reduce throughout the second half 2022. After two years of pandemic-driven stay to home demand, and this type of adjustment is reasonable, in our view. Our expectation is for the excess inventory in the semiconductor supply chain to take a few quarters to rebalance to a healthier level. We believe the current semiconductor cycle will be more similar to a typical cycle, with a few quarters of inventory adjustment likely through first half 2023.

We have also internally modeled and prepared ourselves for various different scenarios in case it is necessary. On the demand side, while we observe softness in consumer end market segment, the end market segments such as data center and automotive-related remains steady. And we are able to reallocate our capacity to support these areas. Despite the ongoing inventory correction, our customers' demand continues to exceed our ability to supply. We expect our capacity to remain tight throughout 2022 and our full year growth to be mid-30% in U.S. dollar terms. Three key factor in supporting TSMC's strong structural demand are our technology leadership and differentiation, our strong portfolio in high-performance computing and our strategic relationship with customers. All of these factors are TSMC's strength in the foundry industry. First, on technology leadership and differentiation, TSMC's technology position is much stronger today as compared to previous years. Looking ahead to 2023, we are working diligently to provide the industry most advanced technologies and making it available to all the product innovators with the successful ramp of N5, N4P, N4X and the upcoming ramp-up of N3, we will expand our customer product portfolio and increase our addressable market. The macroeconomic uncertainty may persist into 2023. Our technology leadership will continue to advance and support our growth. Secondly, the massive structural increase in the demand of computation, underpinned by the industry megatrend, continues to fill greater need for performance and energy-efficient computing, which require use of leading-edge technologies. Through our comprehensive IP ecosystem and optimized process technology, we are able to address and capture the structural demand and build a strong portfolio in high-performance computing. We expect HPC to be the main engine of TSMC's long-term growth and the largest contributor in terms of our incremental revenue growth in the next several years. Third, our strategic relationship with our customers are long-term in nature, developed and built through many years of collaboration and investment to enable customers' success in the high-end market. We continue to work closely with our customer and technology development, capacity planning and pricing to support their long-term demand and growth. With all these three differentiating factors, we expect our capacity utilization to remain healthy in 2023. And our business to be less volatile and more resilient, supported by the strong demand for our differentiated and leading advanced and specialty technologies. Now let me talk about TSMC's long-term growth outlook. While macroeconomic headwinds bring near-term uncertainties that may persist, we believe the fundamental structural growth trajectory in the long-term semiconductor demand remains firmly in place.

We continue to observe silicon content increase across many end devices, fueled by process technology migration and increased functionality. For example, the number of CPUs, GPUs and AI accelerators in the data center are increasing. 5G smartphone carries substantially higher silicon content as compared to 4G smartphone. The amount of silicon content in today's car continue to rise.

While the device unit growth of many electronics device may be flattish to low single-digit percentage range, in the next several years, the silicon content growth will be higher, in the mid- to high single-digit percentage range and support the long-term structural semiconductor demand and increase our addressable wafer demand. TSMC's CapEx and capacity planning are always based on the long-term structural market demand profile, not near-term factors. We are working closely with our customer to plan our long-term capacity and investing in leading edge and specialty technology to support their growth. We will manage our business prudently through the near-term uncertainties, and we remain highly confident in our long-term growth outlook. With our technology leadership, manufacturing and capacity support and customers trust, TSMC is well positioned to capture the strong multiyear growth from the favorable structural megatrend of 5G and HPC related applications and deliver profitable growth for our shareholders. We reiterate our long-term revenue to be between 15 and 20 CAGR over the next several years in U.S. dollar terms.

Next, let me talk about the tool delivery update. As a major player in the global semiconductor supply chain, TSMC work closely with all our tool supplier to plan our CapEx and capacity in advance. However, like many other industries, our suppliers have been facing greater challenges in their supply chains, which are extending toward delivery lead times for both advanced and mature nodes. As a result, we expect some of our CapEx this year to be pushed out into 2023. TSMC is actively doing its part to help our tool suppliers address the supply chain challenges. In April, we said that we have increased regular high-level communications to trace the progress and send several teams on site to support our suppliers. Since then, we have worked closely to identify critical chips that are gauging toward delivery. We are working dynamically with our customers and prioritize our wafer capacity to support these critical chips to help mitigate the chip constant issues. While challenges remain, the situation is improving. We do not expect any impact to our 2022 capacity plan. And we are able to put in the delivery schedule for certain amount of tools for our 2023 capacity. We have been working closely with our customer for 2023 so that we can support their demand.

Now let me talk about the N3 and N3 status. Our N3 is on track for volume production in second half of this year, fiscal year. We expect revenue contribution starting first half of 2023, with a smooth ramp in 2023, driven by both HPC and smartphone applications. N3 will further extend our N3 family with the enhanced performance, power and yield. N3 will offer complete platform support for both smartphone and HPC applications.

We observed a high level of customer engagement at N3. And volume production is scheduled for around one year after N3.

Our 3-nanometer technology will be the most advanced semiconductor technology in both PPA and transistor technology when it is introduced. Thus, we are confident that our N3 family will be another large and long-lasting node for TSMC. Finally, let me talk about the N2 status. Our N2 technology development is on track and progressing well to our expectation, with risk production schedule in 2024 and volume production in 2025. After careful evaluation and extensive period of development, our 2-nanometer technology will adopt the narrow sea transistor structure to provide our customers with the best performance, cost and technology maturity. N2 deliver full node performance and power benefited to address the increasing need for energy-efficient computing, with 10 to 15 speed improvement at the same power or 20% to 30% power improvement at the same speed and larger density of more than 20% increase as compared with N3E. Our 2-nanometer technology will be the most advanced semiconductor technology in the industry in both density and energy-efficient when it is introduced and will further extend our leadership position well into the future. This concludes our key message, and thank you for your attention.

#61

#62

guidance#63

result#64

result#65

guidance#66

guidance#67

context#68

commitment#69

risk#70

strategy#71

risk#72

strategy#73

risk#74

guidance#75

context#76

strategy#77

competitive#78

commitment#79

opportunity#80

risk#81

strategy#82

context#83

opportunity#84

strategy#85

guidance#86

strategy#87

strategy#88

guidance#89

opportunity#90

strategy#91

opportunity#92

context#93

context#94

context#95

context#96

guidance#97

opportunity#98

strategy#99

strategy#100

strategy#101

guidance#102

guidance#103

operational#104

strategy#105

risk#106

guidance#107

strategy#108

strategy#109

strategy#110

strategy#111

strategy#112

context#113

opportunity#114

commitment#115

commitment#116

commitment#117

operational#118

commitment#119

strategy#120

strategy#121

strategy#122

strategy#123

metric#124

commitment#125

context#126

strategy#127

strategy#128

commitment#129

commitment#130

competitive#131

strategy#132

target#133

target#134

competitive#135

strategy#136

#137

Q&A Session

Q&A 1/14

Operatoroperator

The first one to ask question, Randy Abrams, Credit Suisse.

Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse

Thank you. Congratulations on the good outlook. My first question, I wanted to ask on your view on the business cycle.

You raised your outlook to 35% in the strong third quarter. Could — with that strong outlook, I wanted to see what is driving your expectation for inventory drawdown in second half? And how broad you're seeing the inventory drawdown?

And the follow-up question I wanted to ask to that is, what is your view on the first half? With your view customers will be drawing down through the first half, do you see underutilization? And how severe do you expect that correction?

#138

observation#139

question#140

observation#141

question#142

question#143

question#144

question#145

question#146

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

Randy, please allow me to summarize your first question. So I think, Randy, the first part — his first question is in looking at TSMC's third quarter guidance and also looking at our full year growth to be mid-30s. He's wondering, I believe, Randy, how to reconcile this with our expectation of the inventory adjustment in the second half and also into the first half next year. So how do we reconcile our view on the inventory cycle against our own business? Is that correct, Randy?

#147

#148

guidance#149

guidance#150

strategy#151

context#152

Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse

Yes. That's correct. Just an initial view on first half. How much correction you're aiming for in your business?

#153

#154

question#155

question#156

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Randy, this is C.C. Wei. Let me answer your question. Yes, we do have mid-30s growth in this year.

But we also expect our customers start to take action to decrease their inventory level. How far? We expect that a few quarters, at least into the first half of 2023, they will continue to do the inventory correction. And the awarded to TSMC's evaluation, let me say that despite ongoing inventory adjustment and macro uncertainties, the structural growth trajectory in the long-term semiconductor demand remained firm. With our leading and differentiated advance and specialty technologies and a strong HPC portfolio and strategic customer relationships, we expect our capacity remain tight and our business to be more resilient. And we are confident in both our near-term and long-term growth outlook. Did that answer your question?

#157

#158

#159

guidance#160

risk#161

strategy#162

commitment#163

opportunity#164

attribution#165

strategy#166

#167

Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse

Yes. I mean, to clarify, do you expect even through first half to remain tight, factoring in your tech position and some of the projects you have?

#168

question#169

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Yes. You remain.

#170

risk#171

Jeff SuirTSMC

So I think Randy wants to ask, in the first half of next year, do we expect — how do we see our capacity utilization given the ongoing inventory adjustment?

target#172

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

I cannot give you exactly the number that we are talking about, but let me say, it's hearsay. Okay.

metric#173

#174

Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse

Okay. Great. My second question, on the CapEx, two parts. Just want to understand the push-outs, a little more what it's affecting the 3-nanometer. How much ramp the 5-nanometer or mature nodes?

And if you could also discuss the framework for next year's CapEx. I think you've made comments about we could be above TWD 40 billion. If you could give a framework for how you're thinking about next year CapEx.

#175

#176

question#177

question#178

question#179

question#180

observation#181

question#182

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

So Randy's second question is on the CapEx. He wants to know, with some of the tool delivery issues, the CapEx pushout, is this more for 3-nanometer? Is this for 5-nanometer? Or is this more on the mature node side? And he also wants to know how does this impact our CapEx for 2023. As we said before, that 2023 could be TWD 40 billion or higher.

#183

strategy#184

strategy#185

strategy#186

strategy#187

guidance#188

guidance#189

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Okay. Randy, this is Wendell. The first question, as C.C. said in his prepared remarks that the schedule, the tool delivery schedule changes currently as in both the advance and the mature nodes. Okay.

And your second question is about next year's CapEx. It's too early to talk about next year's CapEx. But as we always said, we invest the CapEx in the year for the future opportunities. So as long as the outlook, the future outlook is good, we will continue to invest, but of course, in a disciplined manner.

#190

#191

strategy#192

#193

#194

strategy#195

strategy#196

strategy#197

Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse

Okay. And just for this year, with the pushout, what's your expectation for how much this year would be? And that's my final question. Thank you.

#198

question#199

#200

#201

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

I think next year will be too early. But I can tell you that this year, it will be closer to the lower end of our previous guidance.

context#202

result#203

Jeff SuirTSMC

So closer to the lower end of the guidance of TWD 40 billion to TWD 44 billion, Randy. Okay. Great, thank you. Operator can we move onto the next participant please.

guidance#204

#205

#206

#207

Q&A 2/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask questions is Bruce Lu from Goldman Sachs.

Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs

Hi, thank you for taking my question. Congrats on the great result.

I think I may say that the next few years, the revenue growth will still at the 15% to 20% growth, and it is driven by the compound — dollar content growth. Can you — this is actually the most difficult part for the investor or the biggest discrepancy when we talk to the investor, how much is driven by the dollar content growth? Because investors do not really see the die fab side. So for example, by 50% to 20% growth for the next few years, how much is driven by dollar content growth? How much is driven by shipment? Or how much driven by the ASP or product mix improvement?

#208

sentiment#209

estimate#210

observation#211

question#212

concern#213

question#214

question#215

question#216

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Let me — Bruce, thank you. Let me summarize your first question. So Bruce is really looking at our long-term growth. We said that between — we will grow between 15% to 20% CAGR in the next several years.

He wants to know, out of this 15% to 20%, how much is driven by silicon content? How much is driven by, Bruce, I think you said shipment? How much is driven by ASP?

#217

#218

#219

strategy#220

guidance#221

guidance#222

guidance#223

guidance#224

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Bruce, let me answer the question. But exactly the number, I cannot share with you because it's confidential. But let me say that. The content increase actually is at least mid- to high single digit for our edge devices. And then even all the electronics devices, even the growth is flattish or some kind of a low single-digit.

It's still growing. Itâs still growing. And combined with all these and our value selling with our customer, so we are confident to say 15% to 20% CAGR is achievable. Okay.

#225

context#226

#227

metric#228

metric#229

opportunity#230

opportunity#231

guidance#232

#233

Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs

Okay, thank you. So to my next question is for the mature node and the specialty capacity expansion. I think Chairman recently commented that you will expand your mature node that specialized capacity by 50%, 50, in the next three years. I mean, this number looks a bit big. I mean can you tell us how do you achieve this 50% capacity expansion by the new capacity or conversion? And where are those demand? How do you see the mature node supply and the demand in the coming few years?

#234

question#235

observation#236

sentiment#237

question#238

question#239

question#240

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Bruce, let me summarize your second question, please. All right. So Bruce's second question is on mature node and specialty capacity expansion. He is looking to say TSMC expanding our mature node specialty capacity by 50%. That looks very big. Is that all new capacity expansion? Is some of this also coming from logic conversion to specialty? And then also, what applications are driving this?

#241

#242

#243

strategy#244

commitment#245

metric#246

context#247

context#248

strategy#249

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Well, let me answer the question. 50% increase, we mean that 50% is in specialty technologies capacity. It doesn't mean the overall capacity increase.

Okay. We did this because of our customers' need, and we work closely to support the growth. So it's not a 50% increase in the logic capacity, no. it's specialties.

metric#250

metric#251

#252

operational#253

metric#254

metric#255

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

And if I may add a little bit. The expansion also includes both the new capacity and conversion of existing capacity.

#256

strategy#257

Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs

So how confident you are, I mean, in terms of this kind of capacity expansion, what kind of application which will keep you confident for this kind of increase? So because in the past like 20 years, your capacity expansion is mostly in the advanced node?

question#258

question#259

Jeff SuirTSMC

So Bruce wants to know what is keeping TSMC confident to have such expansion on the specialty technologies as most of our expansion in the past has been focused on the advanced nodes.

strategy#260

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Bruce, you are right. In the past years, TSMC always increased the leading-edge capacity. We did not increase any specialties in the past few years, except a few upgrade from logical to specialty. But this time, it's different. First, because we can see the silicon content continue to increase on all the edge devices. It's not — it's included on the demand on the leading-edge capacity. It also requires the specialties content inside. And so at the urge of our customers' request, TSMC closely work with our customer and to expand our specialty capacities. Okay.

How confident? Very, very confident.

#261

strategy#262

risk#263

strategy#264

opportunity#265

attribution#266

context#267

operational#268

#269

strategy#270

strategy#271

Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs

I believe. So, thank you.

#272

#273

Jeff SuirTSMC

Thank you, Bruce. Operator can we move on to the next participant, please.

#274

#275

Q&A 3/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask question, Sunny Lin from UBS.

Sunny LinanalystUBS

Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions, and congrats on the strong results. So my first question is on the semi cycle earlier, that you have done some scenario analysis on the semi cycle for 2023. So I just wonder what your current base case for semi growth for 2023. Do you think it will be like a typical down cycle like in 2015, 2019? Or would it be a more meaningful correction? Thank you.

#276

sentiment#277

question#278

question#279

question#280

question#281

#282

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Sunny, thank you. Sunny's first question is on the semiconductor cycle. She wants to know what is TSMC's base case for 2023. Do we think it will be more of a typical cycle such as in 2015 or 2019? Or it will be more of a meaningful correction, I believe, are her words.

#283

#284

context#285

strategy#286

competitive#287

strategy#288

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes. Sunny, yes, our base case is a typical — more of a typical down cycle.

The inventory correction maybe go for a few quarters, through the first half of 2023. It's not like a big down cycle back in 2008 or something like that.

context#289

risk#290

commitment#291

context#292

Sunny LinanalystUBS

Got it. Thank you. And so my second question is on 3-nanometer. As we are ramping up the technology in second half, how should we think about the revenue contribution into 2023? In terms of profitability, will the 3-nanometer ramp-up have any impact into Q4 or if the impact will be mostly from Q1 next year?

#293

#294

observation#295

question#296

question#297

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. And so thank you, Sunny. So Sunny's second question is on 3-nanometer. With the ramp, she wants to know what type of revenue contribution from N3 in 2023. And also, with the ramp of N3, what would be the impact to profitability? When should we see it? And what type of impact from N3. Thank you. That's correct. Right, Sunny?

#298

#299

strategy#300

guidance#301

guidance#302

commitment#303

strategy#304

#305

operational#306

#307

Sunny LinanalystUBS

That's right. Thank you, Jeff.

#308

#309

Jeff SuirTSMC

Sure.

#310

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Okay, Sunny. In terms of revenue contribution from N3, I have to say that nowadays, it's less meaningful to talk about the revenue contribution of a leading node at the very beginning when we start to ramp it compared to the — in the past because the total pie is increasing and we believe it will continue to increase. Dollar amount-wise, it's certainly bigger than the previous nodes at the very beginning stage.

This is your first question. In terms of profitability dilution, we expect that it will impact between 2 to 3 percentage points in gross margins in 20 — in the first year, 2023. Thank you.

#311

context#312

metric#313

#314

guidance#315

#316

Sunny LinanalystUBS

Got it.

Thank you. Thatâs very clear. Thank you very much.

#317

#318

#319

#320

Jeff SuirTSMC

Thank you, Sunny. Operator can we move on to the next participant, please.

#321

#322

Operatoroperator

Now let's turn for Gokul Hariharan, JPMorgan. Go ahead, please.

Q&A 4/14

Jeff SuirTSMC

Gokul, are you on the line. You might have to unmute.

#323

#324

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Sorry. My first question is on the…

#325

#326

Jeff SuirTSMC

Gokul, sorry, you're breaking up. Can you try again? Repeat your question, please.

#327

#328

#329

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Yes. Sure. My first question, inventory cycle.

#330

#331

question#332

Jeff SuirTSMC

Gokul, so sorry. Okay. Let's try one more time because you continue to break up. Let's try one more time. If not, I will have to ask you to dial back in. Sorry. Please repeat your question again.

#333

#334

#335

#336

#337

#338

#339

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Sure. Can you hear me now?

#340

#341

Jeff SuirTSMC

Yes.

#342

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Okay. My first is investor's impact. Could you talk to what is your expectation?

#343

question#344

question#345

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Gokul, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Your line is very unstable.

So I will ask you to please try to get back into the queue, and we'll address your question. Okay? Operator can we move on to the next caller please. Apologize for that.

#346

#347

#348

#349

#350

#351

#352

#353

Q&A 5/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask question, Brett Simpson, Arete Research.

Brett SimpsonanalystArete Research

Yes, thanks very much. I had a question on the inventory burden off that you were signaling potentially for first half '23. Can you talk more broadly about fabless days of inventory today and how you see this trending in the second half of the year?

And then in terms of your outlook for the overall semi industry, what is your current view for 2022 growth and 2023 growth? And has your view changed in the last three months? Thank you.

#354

question#355

question#356

question#357

question#358

#359

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Thank you, Brett. So Brett's first question is looking at inventory and the overall industry. So his first question is about the inventory adjustment. We have said that it will likely be through first half 2023. So what do we see for the fabless DOI trending in second half of this year?

#360

#361

context#362

context#363

risk#364

metric#365

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes. Yes, Brett.

We expect the fabless DOI to come down in the second half of the year gradually. And your second question?

#366

#367

target#368

context#369

Jeff SuirTSMC

Come down throughout second half of this year. Correct.

guidance#370

#371

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes, yes.

#372

Jeff SuirTSMC

And then the second part of this question is — Brett, sorry, again, your second part is looking at the industry, what is our current view on the semiconductor industry for 2022 and 2023? And how has our forecast changed or not?

context#373

#374

Brett SimpsonanalystArete Research

That's right.

#375

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Well, let me answer the question. Our forecast for the semiconductor exclude memory and the forecast on the foundry growth in 2022 remain the same as we projected earlier. For 2023, it's too early to forecast.

But as we said, the inventory correction will continue to go on. And for TSMC, because our technology position is much stronger today and we also have a very strong portfolio in HPC and we have a long-term strategic relationship with customer, so we see 2023, even just inventory correction, is still a growth year for TSMC.

#376

result#377

result#378

context#379

risk#380

guidance#381

Brett SimpsonanalystArete Research

Okay. Jeff, can I just have a second question? Is that possible?

#382

question#383

question#384

Jeff SuirTSMC

Sure. One more second question. Yes.

#385

#386

#387

Brett SimpsonanalystArete Research

So we've been hearing from some other leading-edge chip manufacturers that they are looking at the opportunity to work with project financing companies when it comes to new fab builds. I think companies like Brookfield has been mentioned. How does TSMC view this trend? And is there a fab rental model or a way to reduce the free cash flow burden in this industry as you bring on new fabs? Thank you.

observation#388

observation#389

question#390

question#391

#392

Jeff SuirTSMC

All right.

So Brett second question is, he wants to know what is TSMC's view. His observation is other companies in the industry are using project financing to build new fabs, this new fab rental model. So what is TSMC's view on this?

#393

context#394

context#395

strategy#396

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Brett, we are not considering project financing now. Normally, project financing entails stringent, stricter terms and higher costs. We will finance the expansion mainly from our operating cash flow and borrowing using our strong balance sheet. That's our current policy.

strategy#397

context#398

strategy#399

strategy#400

Brett SimpsonanalystArete Research

Right. Thank you.

#401

#402

Jeff SuirTSMC

Alright operator, letâs move on to the next participant, please.

#403

Q&A 6/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask question, Charlie Chan from Morgan Stanley

Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley

Hello, good afternoon. And also, congratulations for great results. So my first question is about your HPC and smartphone demand, because our view is that the macro slowdown or recession should impact the core CapEx and the consumption. So management, do you think that the so-called inventory digestion will sooner later apply to your data center same customers and the high-end smartphone customers order in the coming quarters? Thank you.

#404

sentiment#405

question#406

question#407

#408

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. So Charlie's first question is looking at the inventory adjustment in light of the macro slowdown. He wants to know, do we believe or see impact to cloud service provider CapEx or high-end smartphone sort of to have inventory adjustment next? Is that correct, Charlie?

#409

risk#410

guidance#411

result#412

Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley

Yes. Thank you, Jeff.

#413

#414

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Charlie, this is C.C. Wei. I think to answer your question, you might think they have too much of inventory in the HPC area. But as we said, that in our life, there are so many edge devices continue to create data. And those data need to be processed. And with sufficient speed and efficient power consumption, and that require our leading-edge technology to provide the solution. So even the inventory correction or something like that, we expect our business to be less volatile and more resilience through the near-term uncertainties. And also, we are highly confident in our long-term growth outlook.

#415

#416

result#417

context#418

context#419

strategy#420

strategy#421

strategy#422

Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley

Yes, yes. So how about the high-end smartphone inventory correction? Do you expect that top brand inventory — smartphone inventory to see correction as well on the semiconductor demand? Thank you.

#423

question#424

question#425

#426

Jeff SuirTSMC

So Charlie also wants to know, do we expect high-end smartphone inventory correction on the semi demand?

context#427

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

To be frank with you, we did not see too much of inventory on the high-end smartphone buildup. So no.

context#428

#429

Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley

Okay. Great. That's very helpful. And my second question is about your future technology demand installment. So either Mark or C.C., can you please help me. So this is the first time you've disclosed the N2 DAA large density improvement. I think more than 20% large density increase still better than market share. But compared to the previous node, there's a significant slowdown. So do you think — first of all, N2 is a full node migration. And do you think that there is a kind of a significant slowdown of more slow?

And what does that mean to your CapEx per k for N2 versus N3? And lastly, backside power via. So I'm very interested in your kind of N2, what it means to your long-term technology and also CapEx. Thank you.

#430

#431

#432

question#433

question#434

observation#435

sentiment#436

concern#437

question#438

question#439

question#440

question#441

question#442

#443

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Maybe I'll summarize Charlie's second question into through different parts. His first question is on N2 Technology. And he notes that the logic density gain is more than 20%. But does this represent a significant slowdown, especially in the context of Moore's Law? And what does this mean for technology as a whole? Maybe Chairman can address.

#444

strategy#445

strategy#446

metric#447

strategy#448

strategy#449

#450

Mark LiuexecutiveTSMC

Let me answer your question.

First of all, C.C. just mentioned, our N2 will be the most advanced semiconductor technology in the industry when it is introduced, because this technology, we work closely with our customers, and about — regarding the scaling factor included. But Charlie, we — from now on, we have to look at the technology in a platform fashion. The N2 technology is not just the wafer scaling. The N2 technology include transistor scaling, but also include the new power line structure and also include a new chiplet technology to allow the more architectural innovation in our customers. So this is a whole set of technology offering composed to be N2 nanometer. The scaling factor is smaller, but we really know the customers' needs is — today is really about the power efficiency. And this will be a full node power efficiency migration. And to control the cost, that is the reason we control the scaling factor while maintain the same value for the new generation of technology. So that's my report, yes.

#451

competitive#452

strategy#453

strategy#454

strategy#455

strategy#456

strategy#457

commitment#458

attribution#459

#460

Jeff SuirTSMC

Great. And also Charlie is asking about the backside power on N2.

#461

strategy#462

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Okay. Let me add some viewpoint. On the backside power delivery, actually, we call the super power rail is part of our N2 platform offering. And at the proper time, who are introduced to the market whenever our customer need it.

#463

#464

strategy#465

strategy#466

Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley

Yes. So if you put that together, right, it seems like lower — you have this power via — what does that mean to your CapEx burden in the coming years? Thank you very much.

#467

question#468

#469

Jeff SuirTSMC

Yes. Okay, thank you, Charlie. Operator can we move on to the next participant, please.

#470

#471

#472

Q&A 7/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask questions, Laura Chen from KGI Group.

Laura ChenanalystKGI Group

Thank you for taking my questions. And congrats for the good result.

My first question is about your view on the key applications. Actually, starting from the last quarter, we already see that high computing PC has been the key categories for TSMC. So I'm just wondering your view from various architecture, like on base or X86, can we share with our view that what will be the key driver for TSMC for the next few years? Do you see that will more from the on-base CPU or more upside from the X86?

And also, on the smartphone space, I recall that in the previous analyst call, you mentioned that penetration rate for the on 5G, you expect there will be about like 50%. But given the weak demand growth, well, what's your latest view on the 5G smartphone penetration? That's my first question. Thanks.

#473

sentiment#474

question#475

observation#476

question#477

question#478

question#479

question#480

observation#481

question#482

#483

#484

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. So Laura's first question. First, she wants to know on HPC. She notes HPC has become the largest contributor by platform to our revenue. So she wants to know what — when we look out over the next several years, how do we see HPC? Is this driven by ARM-based or versus x86. I think that's the first part of her first question.

#485

#486

#487

result#488

strategy#489

competitive#490

#491

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Laura, our HPC definitely is growing here.

And since TSMC, everybody's foundry. So we support both X86 and ARM based for what you say for the high-performance computing, both. And both are significantly growing in TSMC.

strategy#492

strategy#493

strategy#494

strategy#495

Jeff SuirTSMC

And then she also wants to — sorry?

#496

Laura ChenanalystKGI Group

Yes. It seems like TSMC already has a very high exposure on the ARM base. So can we expect the next few years still a growth driver to more come from the X86?

#497

observation#498

question#499

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Can I answer this question? We have very high exposure to X86 also.

#500

#501

Jeff SuirTSMC

But Laura, I think we have said numerous times and it still remains holds true that HPC will be the largest contributor and increasingly the main driver of TSMC's growth over the next several years.

strategy#502

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes. And Laura, your second question is the 5G smartphone penetration rate. We're still working at about 50% at this moment.

#503

metric#504

metric#505

Laura ChenanalystKGI Group

Okay, thank you.

And if I can add the second question about the gross margin outlook. I think 59% is really amazing. And considering your CapEx discipline and the consistent delivery in advanced node or maybe price hike as well, can we expect that will have more upside to your current 53% gross margin target?

#506

question#507

sentiment#508

question#509

Jeff SuirTSMC

So Lauraâs, second question is on the gross margin. She notes that gross margin for second quarter, 59.1%, is very high. So is there an upside to our long-term gross margin target of 53% and higher?

strategy#510

result#511

guidance#512

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Laura, as we mentioned before, there are 6 factors that affect our profitability every year. Excluding the foreign exchange rate, of which we do not have any control on, the other factors taking into consideration, we are confident that a long-term gross margin of 53% and higher is achievable. And we certainly — we'll try to work hard to deliver better than that.

context#513

guidance#514

guidance#515

Laura ChenanalystKGI Group

Okay, thank you very much. Thatâs very helpful.

#516

#517

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay, thank you. Operator can we move on the next participant please.

#518

#519

Q&A 8/14

Operatoroperator

Next one, we have Gokul Hariharan from JPMorgan.

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Thanks. Let me try again.

My first question is on the U.S. expansion. There's been a lot of commentary around very high cost for U.S. expansion. I think Founder Chairman — the U.S. perhaps compared to Taiwan. Could you talk a little bit about the U.S. expansion and how they are going? What kind of cost differential is TSMC seeing? And what is your negotiations with the Arizona government solar customers in terms of filling up the cost differential? That's my first.

#520

#521

question#522

observation#523

observation#524

question#525

question#526

question#527

#528

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Gokul, I have to say again, you're breaking in and out.

Let me try to summarize your question, make sure I — we got it right. So Gokul's first question is about our U.S. fab. He notes that the cost is higher. Our founder has recently said this as well. So Gokul, I think your question, again, you broke up, but I think your question is about how do we manage the — how will we manage the cost gap and close the cost gap? Is that your question?

#529

context#530

#531

strategy#532

result#533

result#534

strategy#535

context#536

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Yes. What is your discussions and negotiation with customers and governments regarding higher cost as well as subsidies?

question#537

question#538

Jeff SuirTSMC

So okay.

Thank you, Gokul. So Gokul wants to know, with the higher cost, how our negotiations and discussions with governments? How our negotiations and discussions with customers about this cost differential?

#539

#540

strategy#541

strategy#542

Mark LiuexecutiveTSMC

Okay. Gokul, yes. Yes, I did mention that the cost in the fab in the U.S. is higher than we expected. We are still in the construction stage of the fab. And during this past two years, we found that the labor cost in the States is higher than we planned. And also, some of the COVID supply chain interruption also was an unexpected. And we did confer this information to the government at the location, give them a full perspective of the cost gap.

But Gokul, is indeed the — our customer in U.S., they all want to load that fab. I mean, this is the needs from our customers. And we also believe there is ample — amplify our business opportunity at there.

So the cost is increasing, but cost is not the only factors. And we are still working on the government subsidy and we'll continue working on the cost reduction. And every company have different ways to reduce the cost. So that is the work in the process.

#543

#544

result#545

operational#546

result#547

result#548

strategy#549

context#550

opportunity#551

strategy#552

strategy#553

strategy#554

strategy#555

strategy#556

Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan

Thank you, thank you very much. My second question, would the TSMC consider any kind of a joint venture fab in the U.S. with potential large customers? Historically, TSMC has done this with some of the customers like Altera and NXP long back. Would you consider any kind of joint venture fabs potentially with any of the customers in the U.S. if the outsourcing opportunity big enough? Thank you.

#557

question#558

observation#559

question#560

#561

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

So Gokul's second question is, again, would TSMC consider any type of joint venture fab in the U.S. for outsourcing? He notes we have done certain JVs in the past. So is this something we will consider in the U.S. for outsourcing opportunities?

#562

strategy#563

operational#564

strategy#565

Mark LiuexecutiveTSMC

Yes. Let me answer this question again.

This — our — yes, TSMC indeed has some joint venture arrangement maybe 20 years ago within U.S. But right now, we understand — with that experience, we understand, our customers' demand will go up and down. And we don't — and also, we don't want to limit this fab into a specific set of customers. It's open to the RO customer base to utilize. So no, at this point, we do not plan to have a joint venture arrangement in the U.S.

#566

#567

context#568

context#569

strategy#570

strategy#571

strategy#572

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay, Gokul. Operator — okay, thank you Gokul. Operator can we move on to the next participant, please.

#573

#574

#575

Q&A 9/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask question, Charles Shi from Needham and Company.

Charles ShianalystNeedham and Company

Yes, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question.

I want to go back, a quick clarification about N3 gross margin. You kind of mentioned probably first time quantified how much dilution that you're expecting, 2% to 3%. Can you let us know dilution relative to which number because there is one long-term gross margin number to see, 3% and higher, and there is another one which is where your gross margin is tracking? That's a few points above your long-term target. This is kind of a little bit moving target here. So can you clarify with us? Thank you.

#576

#577

question#578

observation#579

question#580

question#581

observation#582

observation#583

question#584

#585

Jeff SuirTSMC

So Charles is asking if we can clarify our gross margin target. His question, well, I think, again, when we talk about N3 diluting 2% to 3%, it is for the first year, by which is 2023. And so he's wondering I think, Charles, your question is, does this dilution continue? Does this change our long-term gross margin target? And more — maybe more, I think he is thinking about what are the gross — yes, sorry, let me stop there. Is that your question, Charles?

strategy#586

result#587

strategy#588

strategy#589

#590

strategy#591

Charles ShianalystNeedham and Company

No, no, no. The 2% to 3% dilution relative to what, is my question. Is it relative to your long-term growth target, 2% to 3% and higher, or where you're tracking, which is 59%, 58%, yes, that's my question?

#592

question#593

question#594

Jeff SuirTSMC

Thank you, Charles. So Charles is asking, when we talk about 2% to 3% dilution, are we looking at 53% diluting from there? Or are we looking at 59% diluting from here?

#595

metric#596

metric#597

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Charles, it's diluting from next year's gross margin as we forecast. It's neither 53% nor 59%. Bear in mind that when we talk about 53% and higher, it already included the dilution effects from the N3 dilutions.

guidance#598

result#599

guidance#600

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay, Charles? Do you have a second question?

#601

operational#602

Charles ShianalystNeedham and Company

I do. I have a more long-term question. Thank you, Chairman, for mentioning N2 package, which that includes chiplets. I want to specifically ask you about chiplets.

I think you recently talked about expanding SOIC capacity by 20 times through 2026. That's quite a big amount of capacity application. I think one year ago, you sort of mentioned SOIC is something you're targeting for high-performance computing application. But given the amount of capacity increases you're planning, any updated thoughts on whether that can be a technology possibly at N2 to use for smartphone platform? Any other color you can give us would be great. Thank you.

#603

question#604

observation#605

question#606

observation#607

sentiment#608

observation#609

question#610

question#611

#612

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Thank you, Charles. So Charles second question is on 3D IC. He notes that, in particular, we have talking about SOIC and also expanding the capacity there. We have said in the past, this is primarily adopted by HPC applications. His question is, with such capacity expansion, do we also expect smartphone customers to adopt 3D IC solutions like SOIC at some point in the future? Is that correct, Charles?

#613

#614

operational#615

strategy#616

context#617

strategy#618

operational#619

Charles ShianalystNeedham and Company

Yes. Thank you very much.

#620

#621

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Okay. Let me answer this question, Charles. So far, the SOIC is primarily adopted by the HPC applications. Okay. Because of that it's very fit for their high-speed and power efficient.

But for mobile adoption, it will depend on their chiplet's architecture, interconnect density requirement, thermal or other requirement. And we will have other solution to address the mobile requirement.

#622

#623

strategy#624

#625

strategy#626

context#627

strategy#628

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay, alright. Thank you, Charles. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please.

#629

#630

#631

Q&A 10/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask questions, Mehdi Hosseini from Susquehanna International.

Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International

Yes, thank you for taking my question.

I just want to go back to the CapEx. I think the Chairman has guided back in 2021, the shipment guide to worth TWD 100 billion of CapEx during the 2021 through 2023 period. And now this morning, you're highlighting the fact that CapEx this year could be TWD 40 billion. So if I was to use the TWD 100 million, the both suggests to me that your CapEx could be down by as much as 8% to 10% in 2023, unless you are really that TWD 100 billion guide. I just want to get some color on this, and I have a follow-up.

#632

observation#633

observation#634

observation#635

estimate#636

question#637

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

So Mehdiâs first question is on our CapEx. He notes back in April of 2021, we had guided for TWD 100 billion CapEx in the next three years. And so now he's adding the math up for last year and this year, and wondering, does that apply — sorry, imply a decline in our CapEx for 2023? Or do we have a new revised guidance for the CapEx spend?

#638

strategy#639

guidance#640

guidance#641

guidance#642

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Mehdi, let me answer this. We're not going to talk about the TWD 100 billion today. We're not going to comment CapEx beyond 2022.

We've already given the guidance range of 2022. Now as we mentioned before, every year, when we invest in CapEx, it is for the future growth opportunities. So as long as there — we believe the future outlook is good, we will continue to invest in a disciplined manner.

context#643

strategy#644

strategy#645

operational#646

strategy#647

strategy#648

Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International

Got it. And just a quick follow-up here. Despite the fact that CapEx was up 76% last year, 2021, the depreciation so far has been tracking flattish. It was flat in Q1, down 2% in Q2. Should I expect a big step-up in depreciation going forward?

#649

question#650

observation#651

observation#652

question#653

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

So Mehdi also wants to follow up to ask about depreciation. Despite the increase in CapEx, why is the depreciation growth pretty flattish or low so far this year? And then should we expect a step-up in depreciation for 2023?

#654

context#655

result#656

guidance#657

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Mehdi, every year, there are new depreciation coming in. But at the same time, there are depreciation getting out of the depreciation table.

So some comes in, some goes out. This year, we expect that depreciation will grow above mid-single-digits from last year. It is slower — lower than when we guided at the beginning of the year because of some two delivery schedule change, as C.C. mentioned earlier. Now for next year, the — it's too early to give a specific number, but the depreciation will be much higher than this year.

result#658

result#659

result#660

guidance#661

guidance#662

guidance#663

Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International

Okay. And just since everyone had most second question, may I squeeze one quick follow-up?

#664

#665

Jeff SuirTSMC

Well, you have 1.5. I'll let you another half question, please, Mehdi, because we still have a few people on the line. Yes.

#666

#667

#668

Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International

Sure. I'll make it very quick.

When I look at your customers, their inventories are at a 25-year high. And I think everyone is going to take a look at the seasonality in the second half. And I'm just curious, what are the key variables? What are the key metrics? Or what are the key strategies that you have in place that could mitigate the gross margin balance by this if your customers become more aggressive in inventory correction into next year?

#669

#670

observation#671

question#672

question#673

question#674

question#675

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. So Mehdi's question is noting customer inventory at customers are very high. So what would be the key variables or metrics for TSMC to mitigate our gross margin downside or risk if customers were to adjust their inventory further? Is that correct, Mehdi?

#676

context#677

guidance#678

result#679

Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International

Yes. If they become more aggressive in inventory correction into first half next year.

#680

question#681

Jeff SuirTSMC

If they were customers were to become more aggressive on their inventory correction into first half next year.

risk#682

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Well, let me answer the question. As I stated in the remark, our customer are doing the inventory correction. But I said that customers demand still exceeds the TSMC's capability to support for this year. So even they do the inventory adjustment, what I say that they decrease their demand versus their original number, TSMC's capacity is still very tight and will remain very healthy in the utilization. So that's why we can keep our gross margin intact. Did I answer your question?

context#683

context#684

risk#685

risk#686

guidance#687

result#688

context#689

Jeff SuirTSMC

Thank you, Mehdi. Operator, letâs move on to the next participant, please.

#690

#691

Q&A 11/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask questions, Brad Lin from Bank of America.

Brad LinanalystBank of America

Hello, good afternoon everyone. Thank you for taking my question. So firstly, our congratulations once again on the strong earnings. And my first question is about advanced packaging. We learned the advanced packaging is very, very important for TSMC's long-term growth and TSMC has a great variety of offering to provide higher value to customers. So would you please share your insights on what are the key barriers are for wider adoption by plants? And would you expect the contribution mix to increase gradually? Or if there is a point to see an explosive growth from the advanced packaging? And by the way, we saw the news about the DDIC in Japan and how will that can accelerate their progress. Thank you very much.

#692

#693

sentiment#694

question#695

estimate#696

observation#697

question#698

question#699

question#700

question#701

#702

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

So Brad's question is on advanced packaging. I believe if I heard you correctly, what are the key barriers for wider adoption of our packaging solutions by customers? What is the long-term revenue growth outlook of advanced packaging? Is it going to be explosive growth or growth similar to the corporate average and also the role of our 3DIC center in Japan in developing advanced packaging solutions?

#703

strategy#704

strategy#705

guidance#706

guidance#707

strategy#708

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Okay.

That's a very long question, but let me answer one by one. First, we developed a very advanced packaging technology to meet the customers' demand. So far today, 3DIC or SOIC, we develop for the high-speed performance, HPC applications first. And the other one, mostly starting to be adopted by all HPC customers starting from today.

So we expect is gradually will ramp up. And until that's 2-nanometer, I think I have much more demand in that technology node for the 3DIC. That's what we expect. And we expect the growth of these 3DIC business will be healthy, probably a little bit ahead of TSMC's growth forecast.

Now let me turn to the 3DIC center in Japan. We established 3DIC center because of Japan has a fundamental advantage on the raw material also under packaging area. For example, the substrate, they are the number 1 in the world. And we need that one technology to complement the TSMC's 3DIC technology so we can serve our customer better. And that's why we established a 3DIC center technology development center over there. Did I answer your question?

#709

#710

strategy#711

operational#712

operational#713

commitment#714

opportunity#715

strategy#716

strategy#717

operational#718

context#719

context#720

strategy#721

operational#722

#723

Brad LinanalystBank of America

Yes, yes. Very clear. Thank you, sir. So maybe another follow-up, that's also about the IC substrate. So ABF actually substrate currently plays a very important role in advance packaging, of course, especially for coax and the substrate demand potentially in largest with the increasing advanced packaging penetration. So with the rising integration level of a chip, do you expect new material to potentially replace ABF? And any plan to secure substrate supply or upgrade the designs for TSMC for future requirements? And maybe one last follow-up is that, if we compare 2.5D and 3D, would you need more substrate for 3D? Thank you.

#724

#725

#726

observation#727

observation#728

estimate#729

question#730

question#731

question#732

#733

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Well, Brad's second question is on substrates. He wants to know, with the development of substrates and the adoption, do we see further developments in terms of new materials? Will we see more substrates used in 3DIC versus 2.5D? And will we — how do we secure the substrate supply?

#734

context#735

strategy#736

competitive#737

strategy#738

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

Well, this one we are working with the substrate partner. And your question is the 2D, 2.5D or 3D, both, both are important. But let me tell you one further step. We're only interested in the very advance technology.

We are not going to develop any commodity of the substrate technology to compete in the market. No. We are developing for the very high performance computing or very large substrate to support TSMC's customer. That's our purpose.

strategy#739

context#740

#741

strategy#742

strategy#743

#744

strategy#745

strategy#746

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Thank you, C.C. Operator, can we move on to the next participant.

#747

#748

#749

Q&A 12/14

Operatoroperator

Next one to ask question, Krish Sankar from Cowen & Company.

Krish SankaranalystCowen & Company

Yes, hi. Thanks for taking my questions. I have two of them. The first one is, when I look at your full year guidance of 35% revenue growth, it looks like calendar 4Q or the December quarter is going to be sequentially down more than 10%. And that hasn't happened in a long time. So I'm kind of curious, how much of that is driven by demand versus FX? And then the second question, a follow-up is, if I look at your CapEx run rate, the first half is running at about TWD 17 billion, which is below the lower end of your full year guidance. So I'm kind of curious, what are the tool delays that's causing the pushout of CapEx into next year?

Is it like EUV? Is it like depth edge tools? Any color on that would be super helpful. Thank you very much.

#750

#751

#752

estimate#753

observation#754

question#755

observation#756

question#757

question#758

question#759

question#760

#761

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. So Krish has two questions. First is looking at our full year guidance to grow mid-30s, and he says this implies a decline in the fourth quarter?

#762

context#763

guidance#764

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

No, I don't think so. We did the calculation. Maybe you can do that again. It's at least up.

guidance#765

guidance#766

guidance#767

guidance#768

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes. Krish, I would note that when we talk about mid-30s guidance, as C.C. said, that is in U.S. dollar terms. Okay.

#769

strategy#770

#771

Jeff SuirTSMC

And then his second question is on CapEx and sort of looking at the CapEx. His question is we have already said it will be closer to the lower end of the range. He wants to know what is driving the CapEx. Is it tool delays? Is it EUV? What types of equipment?

operational#772

guidance#773

strategy#774

strategy#775

strategy#776

strategy#777

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

No. I don't think we can go into that kind of details. But some of them got pushed out to next year, as C.C. mentioned. And every year, the CapEx profile can be difference quarter-by-quarter.

strategy#778

strategy#779

guidance#780

result#781

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay, thank you. Operator, in the interest of time, I think weâll take questions from the last two participants, please. So, letâs move on to the next.

#782

#783

#784

Q&A 13/14

Operatoroperator

The next one to ask questions, Frank Lee from HSBC.

Frank LeeanalystHSBC

Thank you. I wanted to just ask a question on, I guess, the overall profitability and also pricing. It seems like this year, we start to see a foundry price increase and a bit unusual for TSMC. And going into next year, it looks like there's some manifestation of further price increases.

But at the same time, we're also seeing potentially inventory correction. So just trying to understand the pricing strategy itself, is this more of a reflection of perhaps the structural profitability for this cycle being different than the past? Or are there any kind of cost that we're seeing this time that we haven't seen in past cycles.

#785

question#786

observation#787

estimate#788

concern#789

question#790

question#791

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay.

So Frank's first question is on pricing. He wants to know what is driving our pricing strategy. How do the cost inflation or factors play into it? And really what drives TSMC's pricing?

#792

#793

#794

strategy#795

strategy#796

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes. We do not comment on our pricing details. These are the private discussion between us and our customers. Having said that, our pricing is strategic and value-driven, not opportunistic or cost plus. We work closely with our customers to provide our value. And we will continue to ensure that our pricing reflects our value creations, including technology, ecosystem, and services and capacity support.

By taking all these actions, we believe we can achieve a long-term gross margin of 53% and higher. We do face manufacturing cost challenges. As we mentioned, rising raw materials, utilities and tool costs, et cetera. But having said that, we still think that the 53% long-term gross margin is achievable, and 53% and higher.

#797

strategy#798

strategy#799

competitive#800

strategy#801

strategy#802

guidance#803

risk#804

risk#805

guidance#806

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Frank, do you have a second question?

#807

#808

Frank LeeanalystHSBC

My second question is, I understand the overall view on that. But given what you guys just talked about the overall cycle, I know you still have some — the leadership in the event side and everything else.

But is there a potential bill effect where customers could see a stronger second half this year in anticipation of price increases? And with the adjustment going into next year, that we see some more weakness in the first half more than anticipated in the first half?

observation#809

sentiment#810

question#811

question#812

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Well, Frank's second question is with pricing, will — could there be a situation where customers, I guess, will pull in more of their business to second half of this year, and thus, we would see a weaker first half next year.

#813

risk#814

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

No, we did not see that. We are actually — we are working with our customers and we try our best to support our customers. As I said, even right now, our capacity remains very tight. So the switching between the next year's first quarter and this year's second half, no, we did not see that, just simply put it.

risk#815

strategy#816

risk#817

risk#818

Jeff SuirTSMC

Great. Thank you, Frank. Operator, can we take questions from the last participant, please.

#819

#820

#821

Q&A 14/14

Operatoroperator

The last one to ask questions, Robert Sanders from Deutsche Bank.

Robert SandersanalystDeutsche Bank

Yes. Thanks for taking my questions. I just have two. The first one is just if you could just discuss how much of next year's revenue is under LTA. The reason I'm asking is because there are some people in the market thinking that customers may be fearful of pushing our wafers because they may be jeopardizing agreements for next year.

And then the second question would be just to on the chiplet question. I was just wondering what percentage of the 2-nanometer HPC designs will be using a chiplet architecture. Is it the majority? What's the adoption rate? Thanks.

#822

#823

#824

question#825

concern#826

#827

question#828

question#829

question#830

#831

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. So Robert's first question is he wants to know how much percentage of revenue to long-term agreements with customers represent for TSMC. Maybe Wendell can address this question.

#832

result#833

#834

Wendell HuangCFOTSMC

Yes. Robert, we don't discuss the details like that. We work very diligently and closely with the customers to plan the capacity including receiving the prepayments for capacity support. And we will continue to work with them to decide to determine the best way to support them going forward.

strategy#835

strategy#836

strategy#837

strategy#838

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. And then his second question is on N2. He wants to know, for HPC applications on N2, what is the percentage or that may adopt a chiplet architecture approach?

#839

#840

metric#841

C. C. WeiCEOTSMC

I cannot release the number. But let me assure you that the number of the customers using the chiplet in the N2 or the 2-nanometer technology will start to increase and that will become a major approach in the 2-nanometer and the following technologies.

strategy#842

target#843

opportunity#844

Closing Remarks

Jeff SuirTSMC

Okay. Thank you, C.C. Thank you, Robert. And thank you, everyone.

This concludes our Q&A session. Before we conclude today's conference, please be advised that the replay of the conference will be accessible within one hour from now and the transcript will become available 24 hours from now. Both of which you can find available through TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com. So thank you for joining us today.

We hope everyone continues to stay healthy and safe. And we hope you will join us again next quarter. Goodbye, and have a good day.

#845

#846

#847

#848

#849

#850

#851

#852

#853

#854

#855