Q4 FY2022 Earnings Call
TSM · Preprocessing Report
2023-01-12
Quality
100%
149
Turns
15
Speakers
4
Sections
10
Exchanges
808
Claims

Entities by group 53

semiconductor manufacturer 1
TSMCcompany
analysts 11
Wendell HuangpersonJeff SupersonRandy AbramspersonCharles ShipersonGokul HariharanpersonSunny LinpersonBrad LinpersonCharlie ChanpersonRolf BulkpersonLaura ChenpersonMehdi Hosseiniperson
company executives 3
C. C. WeipersonBruce LupersonMark Liuperson
process technology 6
N3technologyN7technologyN6technologyN5technologyN3EtechnologyN4technology
process node 6
N2technology3-nanometertechnology7-nanometer familytechnology5-nanometertechnologyN+2technologyN1.4technology
data center chips 1
HPCproduct
analyst firms 1
New Street Researchcompany
connectivity technologies 2
RFtechnologyWi‑Fitechnology
semiconductor scaling principle 1
Moore's Lawtechnology
specialty chips 3
ASICproductCPUproductGPUproduct
system-on-chip 2
SoICtechnologySoCtechnology
IoT chips 1
IoTproduct
customer segment 1
DCEproduct
chip stacking 1
3D ICtechnology
lithography technology 2
EUVtechnologyHigh-NAtechnology
packaging services 1
Advanced Packagingproduct
wireless communications 1
5Gtechnology
Ungrouped 9
TWDotherNTotherU.S.otherFab 1otherNanjingotherTainanotherChengduotherTaichung Science ParkotherPCsother
REPORTING 108PROJECTING 85POSITIONING 179EXPLANATORY 59ANALYST 121

Topics 115

research and development×31capacity×30revenue×27gross margin×25capex×23fab×20technology×18demand×16cost×16capital×15pricing×15inventory×14node×133-nanometer×13tax×12semiconductor×12expansion×12packaging×12n3×7question×7

Themes 360

overseas×25specialty×11growth×10global×9guidance×6advanced×6n7 and n6×6arizona expansion×6smartphone×5rising×5sequential decline×4automotive×4semiconductor×4expansion×4cost gap×4correction×4node migration×4outlook×4mature-node strategy×4foreign exchange×3hpc×3annual increase×3first quarter guidance×3capacity utilization×3value×33-nanometer ramp×3revenue contribution×3revenue share×3taiwan expansion×3fab expansion×3strategic value×3node transition×3leadership×3capacity expansion×3question×3second-half rebound×3customer adoption×3gross margin impact×3as share of revenue×2fourth quarter×27-nanometer mix×2iot×2dce×2quarterly spending×2annual growth×2cost improvement×2industry growth×2data center×2volume production×2government support×2efficiency×2capacity economics×2u.s. expansion×2new node×2spending increase×2alternative minimum tax×2spending drivers×2technology development×2confirmation×2cost reduction×2cyclical demand×2external factors×2near-term×2first-half 2023×2ramp×2capital intensity×2cycle peak×2intensity guidance×2system improvement×2leading-edge×2revenue mix×2breakout×2node focus×2u.s. and japan×2improvement×2sequential increase×1quarter-over-quarter improvement×15-nanometer contribution to wafer revenue×15-nanometer mix×1broad-based growth×1high performance computing×1marketable securities×1current×1accounts×1accrued×1turnover days×1days×1from operations×1cash distribution×1quarter-end balance×1technology leadership and megatrends×1drivers of change×1full year increase×1annual level×1investment spend×1operating×1free cash×1cash returns×1macro softness×1taiwan government expiration×1industrial innovation amendments×1future guidance×1quarterly increase×1cost pressure×1as a share of revenue×1r&d increase×1internal improvement×1long-term gross margin outlook×1future growth×1tightening spending×1prudence amid uncertainty×1structural growth×1long-term demand×1structural demand and customer growth×1annual budget guidance×1allocation to advanced process technologies×1allocation to specialty technologies×1allocation to advanced packaging×1sustainable cash payouts×1long-term planning and specialty technology×1customer and shareholder returns×1year-over-year growth in usd×1technology leadership and differentiation×1consumer end market softness×1supply chain rebalancing×1first half decline×1demand stabilization×1second half 2023 growth×1foundry×1slight growth×1product portfolio expansion×1cyclical vs structural×17-nanometer family longevity×1n3 volume production and yield×1n3 ramp for hpc and smartphones×1n3 full utilization amid demand×1revenue comparison×1enhanced performance power and yield×1platform support for smartphone and hpc×1customer engagement×1n3 and n3e versus n5×1demand outlook×1long-lasting node×1technology provider×1customer solutions×1maximization×1long-term constraints×1u.s. customer support×1n4 production×13nm production×1u.s. technology leadership×1next-generation products×1clean-room size×1mature node expansion×1potential second fab in japan×128-nanometer expansion×1china regulations×1volume ramp×1n2 ramp×1support×1long-term guidance×1sustainable profitability×1cost increase acceleration×1taiwan vs arizona comparison×1u.s. cost comparison×1taiwan-us gap×1construction cost×1per node×1new-node development and packaging costs×1geographic expansion×1rise despite tax program×1tax breaks×1customer geography×1resource allocation×1expense outlook×1incentives expiry×1legislative support×1rate guidance×1management response×1mid-term rate increase×1mid-term outlook×1expense ratio guidance×1geographic consistency×1benchmark-based pricing schemes×1overall×1geographic flexibility×1technology and manufacturing advantages×1partial clarity×1geographic and cost-plus×1essentiality in daily life×1supply chain value×1customer improvement×1importance in daily life×1value-based strategy×1demand correction×1full-year outlook×17-nanometer outlook×17-nanometer deterioration×17-nanometer view×17-nanometer recovery×1cyclical issues at other nodes×1pc and smartphone mix×1downturn severity×1softening versus prior period×1cycle pattern×1pandemic downturn amplification×1digital acceleration×1pandemic-driven growth×1pandemic disruption×1buildup strategy changes×1build-up×1industry response×1pandemic-driven phenomenon×1demand and supply planning×1future nodes×1conservative planning×1follow-on question×1process node ramp×1capacity cut×1planning and build-out×1company response×1technology-node buildup×1technology-node planning×1future flexibility×1second-half 2023 rebound×1end-market trends×1smartphones and pcs×1company outlook×1peak and decline×1continued decline×1second-half recovery×1u-shaped outlook×1second-half outperformance×1supporting rebound×1ai and computing×1spending reduction×1future increase×1intensity step-up×1cost control×1investment guidance×1unchanged view×1long-term horizon×1challenge presentation×1supply chain impact×1future relevance×1tsmc view×1beyond geometry shrinkage×1system performance×1greener safer better×1value-add erosion×1chip cost trend in hpc×1design revenue growth in hpc×1interpretation×1asic customer contribution×1customer schedules×1customer plans×1adoption momentum×1customer self-design×1compute opportunity×1chip development×1cannibalization×1hyperscaler cannibalization×1hyperscaler development×1custom design×1broad base×1sales mix×1ramp-up risk×1ramp-up timing×1company focus×1ramp-up demand×1slower 3-nanometer ramp-up×1n3 and n3e adoption vs n5×1n3 technology outlook×13-nanometer peak and longevity×1revenue growth contribution×1u.s. dollar growth×1continued increase×1expanded available×1and automotive demand×12023 outlook×1demand slowdown×1deceleration×1server and automotive×1tight supply×1easing×1expected growth×120-nanometer-below×1high-computing pc applications and advanced packaging×1u.s. long-term direction×1gain around roadmap×1progress update×1timeline delay×1nanosheet structure×1adoption at n2×1high-na availability delay×1production ramp timeline×1schedule unchanged×12023 budget and fab build-out plan×1u.s. build-out cost premium×1allocation between fab build-out and equipment×1higher share for fab build-outs×1infrastructure build-out allocation×1relative to taiwan×1breakdown between tools and construction×1u.s. versus taiwan×1u.s. cost premium×1demand acceleration×1soic technology×1step-up×1incremental expenses×1design enablement and packaging×1multiple areas×1spending focus×1design enablement breakdown×1new technology×1new teams×1increasing complexity×1technology investment×1mixed-signal×1progression×1analog mixed-signal node×1increasing compute content×1rf and high-speed×1rf and low power computing×1low-power×1explanation×1globalization and mature-node exposure×1taiwan cluster efficiency×1japan and u.s. manufacturing footprint×1cluster management×1business model×1customer trust×1competitive advantages×1risk environment×1capacity concentration×1customer value and geopolitics×1pricing pressure×1cautious execution×1strategy×1investment progress×1allocation to mature nodes and advanced packaging×1china status×1allocation to mature nodes and specialty technology×1needs-driven development×1customer collaboration×1wafer shipments and fx pressure×1cutting×1gross margin q&a×1wafer shipments decline×1quarterly improvement×1favorable movement×1nt depreciation×1fx benefit×1lower wafer utilization×1first-half guidance decline×1first-half decline×1decline below target×1long-term outlook×1future outlook×1long-term target×1

Key Metrics 91

revenue×40gross margin×35capital expenditure×26r&d spending×17capacity×16cost×12demand×11inventory×10tax rate×9price×7capex×6growth×6r&d expense×6process node×6construction cost×5ramp-up×5capacity utilization×4production×4investment×4power consumption×4operating margin×3ramp×3volume production×3investment cost×3capital intensity×3units×3nanometer×3costs×3eps×2return on equity×2days×2cash dividends×2r&d expenses×2utilization×2tape-outs×2cost per thousand wafers×2capital expenditure intensity×2growth rate×2research and development spending×2operating expenses×1cash and marketable securities×1current liabilities×1accounts payable×1accrued liabilities×1cash from operations×1cash dividend×1cash balance×1capital expenditures×1roe×1operating cash flow×1free cash flow×1research and development expense×1depreciation expense×1revenue growth×1yield×1area×1cost gap×1fab cost×1r&d to revenue ratio×1margin×1return×1return on investment×1pricing×1wafer price×1outlook×1revenue mix×1unit growth×1guidance×1spending×1capex intensity×1cost per transistor×1power consumption efficiency×1system performance×1revenue share×1sales contribution×1revenue contribution×1revenue contribution percentage×1revenue cagr×1industry growth×1unit shipments×1wafers×1shortage×1schedule×1research and development budget×1fab utilization×1research and development×1wafer shipments×1cost improvement×1foreign exchange rate×1exchange rate×1utilization rate×1

Entities 1053

TSMC×472Wendell Huang×104C. C. Wei×98Jeff Su×57Bruce Lu×37Randy Abrams×28N3×24Charles Shi×20Gokul Hariharan×18Mark Liu×16Sunny Lin×14Brad Lin×14Charlie Chan×13Rolf Bulk×13N7×11Laura Chen×11N2×9Mehdi Hosseini×9N6×8N5×8HPC×7New Street Research×7N3E×63-nanometer×5TWD×4RF×3Moore's Law×3IoT×2DCE×2NT×2N4×23D IC×2Advanced Packaging×2SoIC×2Wi‑Fi×25G×1U.S.×17-nanometer family×1Fab 1×1Nanjing×1Tainan×1Chengdu×1Taichung Science Park×1PCs×1ASIC×1CPU×1GPU×1SoC×15-nanometer×1EUV×1High-NA×1N+2×1N1.4×1

Business Segments 33

Foundry×11High Performance Computing×6Automotive×6Wafer Fabrication×6Packaging×2Internet of Things×1Digital Consumer Electronics×1

Sectors 56

smartphone×12automotive×9cloud computing×8construction×3personal computing×3server×3semiconductor packaging×3high performance computing×2consumer electronics×2data center×2semiconductor manufacturing×2wireless communications×2internet of things×1semiconductor foundry×1supply chain×1mobile computing×1packaging×1

Regions 94

Taiwan×30U.S.×28Arizona×11Japan×8global×5China×5Europe×32023×2United States×1Tainan×1

Metadata Distributions

Sentiment
positive 123negative 62neutral 367
Temporality
backward 131forward 145current 276
Certainty
definitive 125confident 138moderate 124tentative 161speculative 4
Magnitude
major 104moderate 305minor 143
Direction
improvement 36decline 36flat 2mixed 11none 467
Time Horizon
immediate 76near_term 194medium_term 67long_term 27unspecified 188
Verifiability
quantitative 155event 36qualitative 361
Analyst Intent
probing 33challenging 10confirming 10seeking_detail 60seeking_guidance 8

Speakers

Executives
CWC. C. WeiCEOMLMark LiuexecutiveWHWendell HuangCFO
Analysts
BLBrad LinanalystBLBruce LuanalystCSCharles ShianalystCCCharlie ChananalystGHGokul HariharananalystLCLaura ChenanalystMHMehdi HosseinianalystRARandy AbramsanalystRBRolf BulkanalystSLSunny Linanalyst
Other
JSJeff SuirOPOperatoroperator

Sections

TypeLabelSpeaker
preamblePreambleJeff Su
prepared_remarksPrepared RemarksC. C. Wei, Wendell Huang
qa_sessionQ&A Session—
closing_remarksClosing RemarksJeff Su

Q&A Exchanges 10

#AnalystFirmTurns
1
RARandy Abrams
Credit Suisse16
2
BLBruce Lu
Goldman Sachs20
3
GHGokul Hariharan
JPMorgan16
4
CCCharlie Chan
Morgan Stanley14
5
SLSunny Lin
UBS17
6
LCLaura Chen
Citigroup14
7
RBRolf Bulk
New Street Research13
8
CSCharles Shi
Needham13
9
BLBrad Lin
Bank of America11
10
MHMehdi Hosseini
Susquehanna International Group11

Claim Taxonomy 552

REPORTING108
resultFinancial outcome for a completed period89
metricNon-financial quantitative fact8
operationalDiscrete completed event11
PROJECTING85
guidanceQuantitative expectation with number + time52
commitmentPromise with binary verifiable outcome23
targetLong-term aspirational quantitative goal10
POSITIONING179
strategyPriority, direction, or initiative142
competitiveCompany's position or advantages3
opportunityMarket condition framed as growth driver11
riskHeadwind, constraint, or uncertainty23
EXPLANATORY59
attributionWhy a specific outcome happened8
contextNon-company macro/industry fact51
FRAMING0
thesisFalsifiable belief about how the world works0
ANALYST121
questionInterrogative seeking information69
observationRestates a fact or data point27
concernFlags a risk or challenge12
estimateAnalyst's own projection or calculation10
sentimentOpinion, praise, or critique3

Transcript

Preamble
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
[Foreign Language] Good afternoon, everyone and welcome to TSMC's Fourth Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. This is Jeff Su, TSMC's Director of Investor Relations and your host for today. TSMC is hosting our earnings conference call via live audio webcast through the company's website at www.tsmc.com, where you can also download the earnings release materials. If you are joining us through the conference call, your dial-in lines are in listen-only mode. The format for today's event will be as follows.
First, TSMC's Vice President and CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, will summarize our operations in the fourth quarter 2022, followed by our guidance for the first quarter 2023. Afterwards, Mr. Huang and TSMC's CEO, Dr. C. C. Wei, will jointly provide the company's key messages. Then TSMC's Chairman, Dr. Mark Liu, will host the Q&A session, where all three executives will entertain your questions. As usual, I would like to remind everybody that today's discussions may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and which could actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to the Safe Harbor notice that appears in our press release. And now, I would like to turn the call over to TSMC's CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, for the summary of operations and the current quarter guidance.
Prepared Remarks
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Thank you, Jeff. Happy New Year everyone. Thank you for joining us today. My presentation will start with financial highlights for the fourth quarter and a recap of full year 2022. After that, I will provide the guidance for the first quarter 2023. First quarter revenue decreased 1.5% sequentially in U.S. dollar terms as our business was dampened by the end market demand softness and customers' inventory adjustment despite the continued ramp up of our industry leading 5-nanometer technologies. It is at the low end of our previous guidance. In NT dollar terms, revenue increased 2% in the fourth quarter due to a more favorable foreign exchange rate. Gross margin increased 1.8 percentage points sequentially to 62.2% mainly due to a more favorable foreign exchange rate and cost improvement efforts, partially offset by lower capacity utilization. Total operating expenses accounted for 10.3% of net revenue. Operating margin was 52%, up 1.4 percentage points from the previous quarter. Overall, our fourth quarter EPS was TWD11.41 and ROE was 41.7%.
Now, let's move on to the revenue by technology. 5-nanometer process technology contributed 32% of wafer revenue in the fourth quarter while 7-nanometer accounted for 22%. Advanced Technologies defined as 7-nanometer and below, accounted for 54% of wafer revenue. On a full year basis, 5-nanometer technology contributed 26% of 2022 wafer revenue. 7-nanometer was 27%. Advanced Technologies accounted for 53% of total wafer revenue, up from 50% in 2021. Moving on to revenue contribution by platform.
HPC increased 10% quarter-over-quarter to account for 42% of our fourth quarter revenue. Smartphone decreased 4% to account for 38%, IoT decreased 11% to account for 8%, automotive increased 10% to account for 6% and DCE decreased 23% to account for 2%. On a full year basis, all 6 platforms had year-on-year growth. HPC increased 59% year-on-year to account for 41% of our 2022 revenue. Smartphone increased 28% to account for 39%, IoT increased 47% to account for 9%, automotive increased 74% to account for 5%, and DCE increased 1% to account for 3%.
Moving on to the balance sheet, we ended the fourth quarter with cash and marketable securities of TWD1.56 trillion or $51 billion. On the liability side, current liabilities increased by TWD137 billion, mainly due to the increase of TWD48 billion in accounts payable, an increase of TWD93 billion in accrued liabilities and others. On financial ratios, accounts receivable turnover days remain at 36 days while days of inventory increased 3 days to 93 days. Regarding cash flow and CapEx, during the fourth quarter, we generated about TWD487 billion in cash from operations, spent TWD337 billion in CapEx and distributed TWD71 billion for first quarter 2022 cash dividend. Overall, our cash balance increased TWD47 billion to TWD1.34 trillion at the end of the quarter. In U.S. dollar terms, our fourth quarter capital expenditures totaled $10.82 billion. To recap our performance in 2022, we had a strong growth in 2022 as our technology leadership position enabled us to capture the industry's megatrends of 5G and HPC. Our revenue increased 33.5% in U.S. dollar terms to reach $76 billion and 42.6% in NT terms to reach TWD2.26 trillion. Gross margin increased 8 percentage points to 59.6%, mainly reflecting a more favorable foreign exchange rate, value-selling efforts and cost improvement, partially offset by lower capacity utilization. Thanks to better operating leverage, operating margin increased 8.6 percentage points to 49.5%. Overall, full year EPS increased 70.4% to TWD39.2 and ROE was 39.8%.
On cash flow, we spent $36.3 billion or TWD1.1 trillion in CapEx. We generated TWD1.6 trillion in operating cash flow and TWD528 billion in free cash flow. We also paid TWD285 billion in cash dividends in 2022, up from TWD266 billion in 2021.
I have finished my financial summary. Now, let's turn to our current quarter guidance. As overall macroeconomic conditions remain weak, we expect our business to be further impacted by continued end market demand softness and customers' further inventory adjustment. Based on the current business outlook, we expect our first quarter revenue to be between $16.7 billion and $17.5 billion, representing a 14.2% sequential decline at the midpoint. Based on the exchange rate assumption of $1 to TWD30.7, gross margin is expected to be between 53.5% and 55.5%, operating margin between 41.5% and 43.5%. Starting in 2023, certain tax exemptions from the Taiwan government have expired. However, the government has recently passed the amendments to the statute for industrial innovations. All things considered, we expect our effective tax rate in 2023 and beyond to be approximately 15%. This concludes my financial presentation. Now let me turn to our key messages.
I will start by making some comments on our fourth quarter '22 and first quarter '23 profitability. Compared to third quarter, our fourth quarter gross margin increased by 180 basis points sequentially to 62.2%, of which 140 basis points was contributed by a more favorable foreign exchange rate. Meanwhile, cost improvement efforts also helped offset the impact from lower capacity utilization. Compared to our fourth quarter guidance, our actual gross margin exceeded the high-end of the range provided 3 months ago, mainly due to cost improvement efforts. We have just guided our first quarter gross margin to be 54.5% at the midpoint mainly due to a lower capacity utilization rate as customers further adjust their inventory levels and a less favorable foreign exchange rate. In 2023, our gross margin faces challenges from lower capacity utilization due to semiconductor cyclicality, the ramp-up of entry, overseas fab expansion and inflationary cost.
In addition, R&D expenses accounted for 7.2% of our net revenue in 2022. In 2023, we as we increase our focus on technology development and add more resources, we expect R&D expenses to increase by about 20% year-on-year and account for 8% to 8.5% of our net revenue. To manage our profitability in 2023, we will work diligently on internal cost improvement efforts while continuing to strategically and consistently sell our value.
Excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate, we continue to forecast a long-term gross margin of 53% and higher is achievable. Next, let me talk about our 2023 capital budget and depreciation. Every year, our CapEx is spent in anticipation of the growth that will follow in future years. As I have stated before, given the near-term uncertainties, we continue to manage our business prudently and tighten up our capital spending where appropriate. That said, our commitment to support customers' structural growth remains unchanged and our disciplined CapEx and capacity planning remains based on the long-term market demand profile. In 2022, we spent $36.3 billion to capture the structural demand and support our customers' growth. In 2023, our capital budget is expected to be between $32 billion and $36 billion. Out of the $32 billion to $36 billion CapEx for 2023, about 70% will be allocated for advanced process technologies, about 20% will be spent for specialty technologies, and about 10% will be spent for advanced packaging, mass making and others. Our depreciation expense is expected to increase by approximately 30% year-over-year in 2023 mainly as we ramp our 3-nanometer technologies. With this level of CapEx spending in 2023, we reiterate that TSMC remains committed to sustainable cash dividends on both an annual and quarterly basis. We will continue to work closely with our customers to plan our long-term capacity and invest in leading-edge and specialty technologies to support their growth while delivering profitable growth to our shareholders. Now, let me turn the microphone over to C.C.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
result#6
result#7
result#8
result#9
result#10
result#11
result#12
result#13
result#14
result#15
result#16
result#17
result#18
result#19
result#20
#21
result#22
result#23
result#24
result#25
result#26
result#27
result#28
result#29
result#30
result#31
result#32
result#33
result#34
result#35
result#36
result#37
result#38
result#39
result#40
guidance#41
result#42
result#43
attribution#44
result#45
result#46
result#47
result#48
result#49
result#50
result#51
result#52
result#53
result#54
result#55
#56
#57
risk#58
guidance#59
guidance#60
guidance#61
guidance#62
risk#63
context#64
guidance#65
#66
#67
#68
result#69
result#70
result#71
result#72
guidance#73
guidance#74
guidance#75
result#76
guidance#77
guidance#78
strategy#79
strategy#80
guidance#81
#82
result#83
result#84
strategy#85
strategy#86
result#87
result#88
guidance#89
guidance#90
guidance#91
guidance#92
guidance#93
guidance#94
strategy#95
strategy#96
#97
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Thank you, Wendell. Good afternoon, everyone. First, let me start with our 2023 outlook.
Concluding 2022, the semiconductor industry growth excluding memory, was about 10%, while foundry industry increased about 27% year-over-year. TSMC's revenue grew $33.5 million year-over-year in U.S. dollar terms. Our business was supported by our strong technology leadership and differentiation, even as our semiconductor inventory correction began to dampen the momentum in second half 2022. Entering 2023, we continue to observe softness in consumer end market segment, while other end market segments such as data center related have softened as well. As customers and the supply chain continue to take action, we forecast a semiconductor supply chain inventory, while reduced sharply through first half 2023, to rebalance to a healthier level. In the first half of 2023, we expect our revenue to decline mid to high single-digit percent over the same period last year in U.S. dollar terms. Having said that, we also start to observe some initial signs of demand stabilization and we will watch closely for more signals. We forecast the semiconductor cycle to bottom sometimes in first half 2023 and to see a healthy recovery in second half this year. In the second half of 2023, we expect our revenue to increase over the same period last year in U.S. dollar terms. For the full year of 2023, we forecast the semiconductor market, excluding memory, to decline approximately 4%, while foundry industry is forecast to decline 3%. For TSMC, supported by our strong technology leadership and differentiation, we will continue to expand our customer product portfolio and increase our addressable market and we expect 2023 to be a slight growth year for TSMC in U.S. data terms.
Next, let me talk about the N7, N6 demand outlook. 3 months ago, we set our N7, N6 capacity utilization in first half '23 will not be as high as it has been in the past 3 years due to end market weakness in smartphone and PCs and customer's product schedule delay. Since then, the end market demand for smartphone and PCs has further weakened and the capacity utilization of N7, N6 is lower than our expectation 3 months ago. We expect this to persist through first half '23 as our semiconductor supply chain inventory takes a few quarters to rebalance to a healthier level and we expect a mild pickup in our N7, N6 demand in second half 2013 than our prior expectation. However, we continue to believe N7, N6 demand is more a cyclical issue rather than structural. We are working closely with our customers to develop specialty and differentiated technologies to drive additional wave of structural demand from consumer, RF, connectivity and other applications to backfill our N7, N6 capacity over the next several years. Thus, we are confident our 7-nanometer family will continue to be a large and long-lasting node for TSMC.
Now, I will talk about our N3 and N3E status. Our N3 has successfully entered volume production in late fourth quarter last year as planned with good yield. We expect a smooth ramp in 2023 driven by both HPC and smartphone applications. As our customers' demand for N3 exceeds our ability to supply, we expect the N3 to be fully utilized in 2023. Sizable N3 revenue contribution, we expect to start in third quarter '23 and N3 will contribute mid single-digit percentage of our total wafer revenue in 2023. We expect the N3 revenue in 2023 to be higher than N5 revenue in its fourth year in 2020. N3E will further extend our N3 family with enhanced performance, power and yield and offer complete platform support for both smartphone and HPC applications. Volume production is scheduled for second half '23. Despite the ongoing inventory correction, we continue to observe a high level of customer engagement at both the N3 and N3E with a number of tape-outs more than 2x that of N5 in its first and second year. Our 3-nanometer technology is the most advanced semiconductor technology in both PPA and transistor technology, thus, we expect customers a strong demand in 2023, 2024, 2025 and beyond for our 3-nanometer technologies and are confident that our N3 family will be another large and non-large node for TSMC. Finally, let me talk about our plans to expand TSMC's global manufacturing footprint to increase customers' trust and expand our future growth potential. TSMC submission is to be trusted technology and capacity provider for the global IC, logic IC industry for years to come. Our job is to provide the optimal solutions for our customers to enable their success, this including technology leadership, manufacturing, cost, trust and recently also including more geographic manufacturing flexibility. Based on customers' request, we are increasing our capacity outside of Taiwan to continue to provide our customers the optimal solution they need to be successful. TSMC's decisions are based on our customers' need and the necessary level of government support. This is to maximize the value for our shareholders. Our decisions are also based on the talent pool, land, electricity and water needs for TSMC's long-term growth.
In the U.S., we are in the process of building two advanced semiconductor fabs in Arizona. Our U.S. customers welcome us to build capacity in the U.S. to support their needs and have placed their strong commitment and support. We had an opening ceremony on December 6 last year to celebrate the arrival of the fourth batch of state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing equipment and Fab 1 is on track to begin production of N4 process technology in 2024. We also announced the construction of a second fab, which is scheduled to begin production of 3-nanometer process technology in 2026. TSMC Arizona will continue to provide the most advanced semiconductor technology commercially available in the U.S., enabling next-generation, high-performance and low-power computing products in the future years. Each of our fab will have a clean-room area that is approximately double the size of a typical logic fab. We will also consider building additional mature node capacity outside of Taiwan. In Japan, we are building a specialty technology fab, which will utilize 12 and 16-nanometer and 22, 28-process technologies. Volume production is scheduled for late 2024. We are also considering building a second fab in Japan as long as the demand from customers and the level of government support makes sense. In Europe, we are engaging with customers and partners to evaluate the possibility of building a specialty fab, focusing on automotive-specific technologies based on the demand from customers and level of government support. In China, we expand 28-nanometer in Nanjing as planned to support local customers and we continue to follow all the rules and regulation fully.
At the same time, we continue to invest in Taiwan and expand our capacity to support our customer's growth. Our N3 has just entered volume production in Tainan Science Park. We are also preparing for N2 volume production starting in 2025, which will be located in Chengdu and Taichung Science Park. While capacity is not born overnight and takes time to build, we are committed to expanding our global manufacturing footprint to increase customer trust and expand our future growth potential.
Depending on the demand from customers and level of government support, our 28-nanometer and below overseas capacity could be 20% or more of our total 28 and below capacity in 5 years or more time. While initial cost of overseas fab are higher than TSMC software in Taiwan, our goal is — and minimize the cost gap. Our pricing will remain strategic to reflect our value, which also including the value of geographic flexibility. At the same time, we are leveraging our competitive advantage of lost volume, economies of scale and manufacturing technology leadership to continuously drive cost down. We will also continue to work closely with our government to secure their support. By taking such actions, TSMC will have the ability to absorb the higher cost of overseas fabs while remaining the most efficient and cost effective manufacturer, no matter where we operate. Even we increased our capacity outside of Taiwan, we believe long-term gross margin of 53% and higher continue to be achievable and we can earn a sustainable and healthy ROE of greater than 25%, while delivering profitable growth for our shareholders. This concluding our key message. Thank you for your attention.
#98
#99
#100
opportunity#101
opportunity#102
result#103
strategy#104
attribution#105
risk#106
risk#107
commitment#108
guidance#109
opportunity#110
context#111
opportunity#112
guidance#113
risk#114
risk#115
guidance#116
strategy#117
target#118
target#119
metric#120
result#121
guidance#122
guidance#123
context#124
strategy#125
strategy#126
strategy#127
#128
operational#129
strategy#130
strategy#131
guidance#132
guidance#133
guidance#134
strategy#135
strategy#136
commitment#137
strategy#138
metric#139
strategy#140
strategy#141
strategy#142
strategy#143
strategy#144
commitment#145
strategy#146
strategy#147
context#148
commitment#149
strategy#150
operational#151
commitment#152
commitment#153
commitment#154
opportunity#155
strategy#156
target#157
commitment#158
commitment#159
commitment#160
commitment#161
strategy#162
strategy#163
commitment#164
context#165
strategy#166
commitment#167
operational#168
commitment#169
strategy#170
strategy#171
target#172
result#173
guidance#174
strategy#175
result#176
context#177
risk#178
guidance#179
guidance#180
#181
#182
Q&A Session
Q&A 1/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. The first question is come from Randy Abrams with Credit Suisse. And Randy, please go ahead.
RA
Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse
Okay. Yes, thank you.
I wanted to ask the first question just about the rising investment costs and also the cost differential with the U.S. Just based on the two press releases, the Taiwan fab, you cited Fab 18, about $60 billion investment for eight phases, which would be, I estimate about 200,000 capacity, that's about $300 million per thousand wafer. The Arizona fab was $40 billion for about 50,000, $800 million per thousand wafers. So, just two questions on it. If you could maybe discuss a bit more if there is differences in those releases on the investment in calculation and a bit more color on the relative costs since you did the U.S. expansion?
And then the second part of the question is, is the cost seeing a significant acceleration? It's been rising with each new node. But are you seeing an accelerating pace as you move through 3 and 2-nanometer?
#183
#184
concern#185
estimate#186
estimate#187
estimate#188
estimate#189
#190
question#191
question#192
question#193
observation#194
question#195
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Randy, thank you. Please allow me to summarize your question. So Randy's first question is he wants to understand, I think, he's referring, I think, to our press release when we — about N3 in Tainan and the total investment there, and how does that compare to our announcement of the investment in Arizona for two phases. Randy, if I got you correctly, basically what Randy is asking is, what is the cost in the U.S. seem much higher in terms of the investment? So what is driving this big difference or a gap, so to speak.
That's the first part of your question, right, Randy. Okay. So that's the first part.
#196
#197
#198
result#199
result#200
result#201
result#202
#203
#204
RA
Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse
Right. Yes, that's right. That's the first part.
#205
#206
#207
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Okay. Hi, Randy, this is Wendell.
Let me share with you this. The Arizona fab, we make the decision based on customers' request. And so we're planning on building the two fabs, one N5, actually N4 and the other one N3. We're not able to share with you a specific cost gap number between Taiwan and U.S., but we can share with you that the major reason for the cost gap is the construction cost of building and facilities, which can be 4 to 5x greater for U.S. fab versus a fab in Taiwan. The high cost of construction includes labor cost, cost of permits, cost of occupational safety and health regulations, inflationary costs in recent years and people and learning curve costs. Therefore, the initial cost of overseas fabs are higher than our fabs in Taiwan.
#208
#209
#210
operational#211
commitment#212
context#213
risk#214
context#215
result#216
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
And I think the second part of Randy's question was about the — how do we see the CapEx per K as we go from, I guess, Randy, you're asking N5, N3 and 2.
result#217
RA
Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse
Yes, it's seeing a faster pace of expansion through these next couple of nodes.
question#218
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Right. Randy, we're not able to disclose the specific CapEx per K for each node, but certainly, the CapEx is, K is more expensive for a new node as the process capacity increases. Okay?
#219
context#220
risk#221
#222
RA
Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse
Okay. And the second question, just on actually two areas that came up in the remarks. The R&D, the over 20% increase. If you could give a feel like what's mainly driving that additional step up, is it the development cost for the new nodes, the packaging? Or is it some now expanding R&D into new geographic areas?
And if I can fit in the second part, just the tax rate, Taiwan was hyping a pretty big program of CapEx and R&D, but tax breaks, but your tax rate is going up from 11% to 15%. Is that alternative minimum tax or global tax? Just want to understand why not any benefit from that?
#223
#224
observation#225
question#226
question#227
question#228
question#229
question#230
question#231
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So Randy's second question, I guess, is sort of two parts financial related. First, we — our CFO said, our R&D spending will increase about 20% year-on-year. So Randy wants to know what is driving behind that? Is it customer going overseas? Is it more technology development as a technology leader, etcetera? And then the second part, he wants to understand the guidance of effective tax rate of 15% given the recent legislation passed in Taiwan. Why is it not lower?
#232
#233
guidance#234
result#235
strategy#236
strategy#237
result#238
guidance#239
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Okay. Randy, for the first question, we're the technology leader, and we intend to continue to maintain the leadership. Therefore, we are devoting more and more resources in R&D, including people and other kind of resource. That's the reason why our R&D expense will increase in 2023 and probably beyond. The other thing about tax in 2023, part of the tax exemptions — or incentives in Taiwan have expired. Without the new amendments to this industrial innovation, the statute of industrial innovation, our tax rate would have become between 18% to 19%. With this new amendment, our tax rates will drop to about 15%.
#240
strategy#241
strategy#242
guidance#243
risk#244
guidance#245
guidance#246
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Does that answer your question, Randy?
#247
context#248
RA
Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse
Yes, that does, I mean this mid-term R&D do you think the rate stays at this level or could go up one more? That's my final one. Thank you.
question#249
question#250
#251
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
From what we are seeing at this moment, we expect the R&D to revenue ratio to be between 8% to 8.5% in the next several years.
guidance#252
RA
Randy AbramsanalystCredit Suisse
Okay, thank you, Wendell.
#253
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you, Randy. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please?
#254
#255
Q&A 2/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Sure. And our next question is come from Bruce Lu with Goldman Sachs. Bruce, please go ahead.
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
Okay, thank you for taking my question. The first question is focused on the overseas capacity expansion. So I think you just mentioned that even though we cannot disclose it, but the cost is definitely higher for the overseas capacity, but the management believes that the margin will stay the same. So I mean — I think I asked this question back to 2019, the manager was talking about the pricing will be the same across the board regardless of geographical locations. So what has changed now?
So with the different pricing, can we say the overseas capacity will generate a similar return on profitability throughout the cycle? So — or what is the benchmark you're looking for when you set of the different pricing scheme?
#256
observation#257
observation#258
observation#259
question#260
question#261
question#262
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
So Bruce from Goldman Sachs actually, his question is regarding — first question regarding overseas expansion. His question is we said overseas costs are higher, yet that — so his question is in regards to our pricing. Are we a higher price overseas? Or if it's overall? And what is the benchmark that we use when we go overseas in terms of financial returns and price? Is that roughly correct, Bruce?
#263
strategy#264
strategy#265
strategy#266
strategy#267
strategy#268
context#269
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
Yes, that's correct.
#270
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Okay, Bruce, this is Wendell, we're not able to comment on pricing details, but our pricing is always strategic and consistent to reflect our value. Now value to our customers as C. C. said in this statement includes technology leadership, manufacturing efficiency and quality, cost, trust and recently also includes more geographic manufacturing facilities. Therefore, our overall pricing will remain strategic to reflect our value, which includes the value of geographic flexibilities. Does that answer your question?
strategy#271
strategy#272
strategy#273
strategy#274
strategy#275
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
Well, to some extent. Let me ask the question in different ways is that we do understand it will reflect TSMC's value, i.e., geographical location is a bad, but at the end of the day, it's a cost plus for everybody across the board. I mean, how confident that TSMC feels that the customers can swallow all the cost and the end customer with one of the costs, i.e., without triggering the potential wafer price inflation or semiconductor inflation at the end of the day with more and more global capacity for TSMC.
concern#276
concern#277
question#278
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Yes. Okay. Bruce, let me add that in C. C.'s statement, he also mentioned that we will — aside from selling our value, we will continue to drive down our cost, but also to leverage our competitive advantages of large volume, economy of scale and manufacturing technology leadership. And with all these actions plus the government support, we are able to absorb the higher cost of overseas fabs and maintain our long-term financial goals, gross margin of 53% and higher.
#279
#280
#281
strategy#282
guidance#283
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Let me add some color. this is C. C. Wei.
Actually, in our view, the semiconductor becomes more essential and more pervasive in people's life. And the semiconductor industry value in the supply chain is increasing. And if we look at our customers' performance, they are rising structural gross margin over the past 5 to 6 years, it continued to improve. That reflects what I just said, the semiconductor value has been recognized and also very important in our daily life. And so we set up our pricing strategy to reflect all the values we share to customer and customer also in the value from the end market.
#284
#285
#286
context#287
opportunity#288
result#289
context#290
strategy#291
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you, C. C. Bruce? Do you have a second question?
#292
#293
#294
#295
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
Yes, please. The second question is for the N7.
I think we spent some time for 7-nanometer, which is more cyclical. I think after 3 months, I think the correction is even bigger. So how — can you share us the full year outlook for 7-nanometer? When we can expect the customer or the 7-nanometer capacity return to normal back to like fully utilized? Or can we avoid the same cyclical symptom in 5-nanometer and 3-nanometer in 2, 3 years from now?
#296
observation#297
concern#298
concern#299
question#300
question#301
question#302
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
So Bruce's second question was on 7-nanometer. So his question is 7-nanometer seems to have deteriorated versus 3 months ago. So what is our view? Can it fully recover in this year? And then I think, Bruce, the second part of your question is also how can we avoid the same cyclical systems at other nodes in the future. Is that correct?
#303
strategy#304
risk#305
strategy#306
commitment#307
strategy#308
strategy#309
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
Yes.
#310
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
#311
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
So I answer this one? First, N7 most of business for TSMC in the last 2 years is from the PC and smartphone. And that happened to correct — or let me say that inventory correct happened to be the most severe one. And so the end market dropped most severely generally thought. In fact, the unit will not increase, but the content will be increased, so is demand be more softened than we thought 3 months ago?
Why be repeated at 5 or 3? Cyclicality of the semiconductor always exist, but it's unlikely this time the scenario was to be repeated because our current downturn actually, it's kind of being enhanced or being degraded by the pandemic. Due to the pandemic, the digital transformation progress have been enhanced. And so the demand being increased dramatically. But then due to the pandemic, the supply chain disruption happened.
And people during this time, probably changed their strategy or their thoughts on the inventory buildup. So artificially, the inventory has been built up quickly and dramatically. And then the response to the each industry are different. And so they manage the inventory correction also differently. This kind of phenomenon all because of — largely because of pandemic, and we don't think that it will happen again. And in the next 5-nanometer, 3-nanometer, I believe TSMC and TSMC's customer will be more prudent on planning that what is the demand and also the supply.
#312
metric#313
risk#314
risk#315
risk#316
context#317
attribution#318
attribution#319
attribution#320
attribution#321
context#322
result#323
context#324
context#325
opportunity#326
strategy#327
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Bruce, does that answer your second question?
#328
context#329
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
Yes, let me follow-up a little bit. I mean C. C. just mentioned external factors, right? So what did TSMC do to avoid the same thing for 5 and 3 in the future for someone like if you are cutting your capacity plan into a more conservative way or something like that? Is that something we should expect in future nodes?
#330
question#331
observation#332
question#333
question#334
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
So Bruce is asking sort of a follow-on.
So then with 7-nanometer, how do we avoid the same thing happening at 5 or 3 in the future? Will we cut our capacity? How do we change our capacity planning and build to avoid a similar situation?
context#335
strategy#336
strategy#337
strategy#338
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Bruce, this is a very good question. Actually, let me share with you how we deal with it. In fact, between the N5, N3, the technology node our capacity buildup and with a lot of tools that can be company used by these two nodes. So in fact, for TSMC to build capacity, we put N5, N3 and maybe in the future N2 as a total picture to look at it. And we will keep our flexibility to create or to adjust for the future. So we will be better prepared. That's what I can tell you.
context#339
strategy#340
strategy#341
strategy#342
strategy#343
strategy#344
context#345
BL
Bruce LuanalystGoldman Sachs
That's good to hear. Thank you.
sentiment#346
#347
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you, Bruce. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please?
#348
#349
Q&A 3/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Sure. And our next question is come from Gokul Hariharan with JPMorgan. And Gokul, please go ahead.
GH
Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan
Hey, thanks. Happy new year.
And let me take my first question on the near-term 2023. So you mentioned first half, we have seen a worse kind of environment compared to 3 months back. Is it mainly HPC data center that has seen further reduction? Or are we seeing it across the board, including smartphone for first half? And also on second half, just putting in rough numbers on your guidance, looks like we are looking for a pretty sharp rebound in second half of 2023, something like 25% to 30% second half versus first half of this year. Could we have some more color on what is that gives you the confidence for such a strong rebound in the second half of the year to get us back to like a flattish revenue growth for the year?
#350
#351
question#352
observation#353
question#354
observation#355
estimate#356
question#357
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
So Gokul's first question is on the near-term outlook. He wants to understand first half, we said the inventory correction in sharper. So he wants to understand what are we seeing in different end market segments? Is the sharper correction driven by data center? Is it smartphone PC? What are we seeing across the different segments first?
#358
strategy#359
result#360
result#361
context#362
context#363
strategy#364
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Well, let me answer the question. The inventory correction actually began last year. And at the peak of the third quarter, and we think the inventory has been picked in third quarter last year and gradually reduced in the fourth quarter, and we did see some inventory reduced sharply recently, and it will continue to be so to first half of this year.
So that's why we say we have confidence that in the second half, the business will rebound. But is that a very strong V shape? We didn't know yet, but certainly, it's not a U shape for the business to recover in the second half.
#365
operational#366
context#367
commitment#368
strategy#369
strategy#370
risk#371
GH
Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan
Okay. I think N3 is clearly one part of that ramp. But is there anything else that is — that you are already seeing that strong confidence for the second half rebound in addition to the N3 ramp-up?
#372
observation#373
question#374
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Sorry. So Gokul is asking sort of in terms of second half, why can TSMC's business be better than the overall industry besides N3. Are there any other factors when you think about technology leadership?
#375
competitive#376
strategy#377
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Gokul, you are right. enters a ramp-up here of the business to rebound, and also actually, let me share with you some of the HPC customer. Also, I have a new product launch in the second half, especially in the AI area or in computing area. Did that answer your question?
strategy#378
commitment#379
strategy#380
GH
Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan
Understood. Okay, thank you. That's my first question. Jeff, can I move on to the second one?
#381
#382
#383
#384
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Yes, please.
#385
GH
Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan
Yes, thank you.
My second question is on CapEx and capital intensity. CapEx, we are taking it down a notch for this year given the downturn, I guess, and some conservatism. Are we already seeing the peak in CapEx intensity in the cycle? Or we are likely to given the plans in Europe plans to expand more capacity in U.S.? Are we likely to see higher CapEx intensity in the out years as well?
#386
question#387
observation#388
question#389
question#390
question#391
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Sorry. Is that your okay, Gokul.
I think I got the gist of your question. So Gokul's second question is on CapEx and capital intensity. He notes this year, we have guided 32% to 36% given sort of some tightening up and such. So his question is — does this represent, have we already seen or past the peak in terms of our capital intensity this cycle, or as we may continue to evaluate and expand overseas and such? Will there be another step-up in our capital intensity?
#392
#393
context#394
#395
context#396
guidance#397
commitment#398
commitment#399
guidance#400
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Okay. Gokul, this is Wendell.
As we said before, we invest the CapEx this year for the growth in the future years. So we also said earlier that we are tightening up the spending where appropriate. But as long as we believe the growth opportunity is there, we will continue to invest. Now we've given the guidance for this year, so you can calculate the capital intensity. It will be over 40%. From what we are able to see at this moment, several years down the road, we're seeing the CapEx intensity to be between mid to high 30s. That's the current view.
#401
#402
strategy#403
strategy#404
strategy#405
context#406
guidance#407
guidance#408
strategy#409
GH
Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan
Thanks, Wendell. Is that several years like 5 years out or is it like close to like that?
#410
question#411
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Yes. Something like that. Something like that.
#412
#413
#414
GH
Gokul HariharananalystJPMorgan
Okay, understood. Thank you very much.
#415
#416
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Alright. Thank you, Gokul. Operator, can we move on to the next participant.
#417
#418
#419
Q&A 4/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. And our next question is come from Charlie Chan with Morgan Stanley. And Charlie, please go ahead.
CC
Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley
Thanks for taking my questions, gentlemen. So first of all, a question to C. C. And so thanks for your sharing during the [inaudible] association, presentation on semiconductor challenge was pretty insightful. So my question is that you mentioned during your speech saying that the biggest change for semiconductor cost is getting higher, better long so-called [inaudible] supply chain.
So I wanted to ask C. C., what's the true value add of worth low going forward becomes much more expensive and whether you really see that customers can continue to expand our gross margin and create value to this world. So this is my first question. Thank you.
#420
#421
#422
observation#423
question#424
#425
question#426
#427
#428
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So Charlie's first question is around technology. He notes that the cost, I guess, and cost per transistor is getting higher and overall global costs are increasing as well. So his question is, what is the value or is there still value in the so-called Moore's Law going forward? How does TSMC view this issue?
#429
context#430
risk#431
context#432
strategy#433
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Well, Charlie, let me share with you, nowadays, we look at our technologies value not only geometries shrinkage actually.
More important actually is the power consumption efficiency. And also, we try to help our customers with our advanced 3D IC Fabric technology to improve the system performance, and that's where it's important. In the future, we want the world to be more greener more safer, better. So power consumption needs become very, very important. And while we still improve the system performance and that's where our customer can get their value. And that's what we view in the future.
context#434
context#435
strategy#436
strategy#437
context#438
strategy#439
strategy#440
CC
Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley
Thank you. Thanks for the explanation. So the follow-up to that is that we noticed that for your major smartphone SoC customers, they seem to slow down the migration to the newer nodes, right, or so-called bifurcation for their new SoC adoption. So do you think for mobile computing, particularly do you think a value-add is diminishing based on what you just said. And also another structural trend we are seeing is about the cost of chip by ASIC in HPC segment. So can management talk about that part of business, meaning the ASIC design themselves of total revenue contribution in HPC and the growth rate of the 8-figure business? Thank you.
#441
#442
observation#443
question#444
observation#445
question#446
#447
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So Charlie, I'm going to interpret. So he has a follow-up to his first question and then his second question. So the follow-up to his first question is then in terms of going back to cost again, do we see any sign of slowdown in smartphone SoC migration at the leading node. That's his follow-up. And then his second question is then do we see more companies designing ASICs? And can we disclose the revenue contribution from such customers? Correct, Charlie?
#448
context#449
#450
context#451
#452
context#453
strategy#454
context#455
CC
Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley
Yes, correct, please.
#456
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Okay. Charlie, let me answer your question.
In fact, we do not see any slowdown on our customer to adopt the TSMC's leading-edge technology. Actually, they might have a different kind of product schedule. They might have a different kind of product plan and etcetera. But the technology adoption, actually, it did not slow down.
That's my answer to your first follow-up question. And the whether that some kind of customer, some of the hyperscale customers want to develop their own chip. Yes, but I cannot give you more information than that. However, I can tell you that they also look at compute for their own business, the positioning for the opportunity actually increase our opportunity. And that requires TSMC is a leading-edge technology. So we do have quite a few hyperscale customers working with TSMC to develop their own chips.
#457
#458
strategy#459
context#460
context#461
strategy#462
#463
context#464
#465
strategy#466
strategy#467
strategy#468
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay, thank you.
#469
CC
Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley
And would that cannibalize your merchant business, for example, those on change CPU, GPU are they going to be replaced or impacted by those custom design growth? If I may?
question#470
#471
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Last question, Charlie is asking then his concern is that any hyperscalers are developing will that cannibalize business for other types of companies?
#472
context#473
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
I cannot comment, but I don't think so. They also developed the specific purpose for own I mean it's not a kind of to replace, generalize the purpose of CPU, GPU, all those kind of things.
context#474
strategy#475
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
And I think also for TSMC, we're happy to work with all types of customers, whatever type they may be. Okay, thank you, Charlie. Let's move on to the next participant.
strategy#476
#477
#478
CC
Charlie ChananalystMorgan Stanley
Thank you.
#479
Q&A 5/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. And our next question is come from Sunny Lin with UBS. And Sunny, please go ahead.
SL
Sunny LinanalystUBS
Sure. Thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions.
So my first question is on the SoC ramp up and so if we look at the share revenue could be higher than 5-nanometer for the first year. But if we look at the sales contribution as a percentage of total sales, it's actually a bit lower. And so I wonder for this year, perhaps there is some market issue. But looking into 2024 and 2025 based on your current customer engagement, should we model a faster ramp up into 2024 or 2025 or its overall ramp-up could be slower because of maybe customer schedule issues or planning? And if we think about the peak revenue contribution for 3-nanometer over time, do you think you will be able to reach 30% range, as N5 and N7. That's the first question. Thank you.
#480
#481
#482
#483
concern#484
observation#485
concern#486
question#487
question#488
#489
#490
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Sunny's first question is on 3-nanometer. She notes 3-nanometer revenue is greater than 5-nanometer in its first year, but the revenue percentage contribution of mid-single digit is smaller or lower. So she's wondering why is that. Is it because the market slowed down? Is it less customer adoption and interest? What is the reason behind that? And does that mean what is our expectation for that ramp to continue? [Technical Difficulty]
#491
strategy#492
result#493
result#494
operational#495
operational#496
risk#497
strategy#498
#499
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
N3, N3E the number of tape-outs more than double that N5 in the first and the second year. So as a result, we expect the strong demand will continue in 2023, '24, '25 and beyond, for our N3 technologies driven by both the HPC and smartphone applications.
target#500
attribution#501
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Yes. Okay. Yes, does that answer…
#502
#503
strategy#504
SL
Sunny LinanalystUBS
Got it. Yes, partially. So any thoughts on the potential peak revenue contribution in the next couple of years?
#505
#506
question#507
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Too early to talk about that N3, but we continue to believe that it will be a large and long-lasting node for us.
strategy#508
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
It will be an important contributor to our 15% to 20% revenue CAGR in the next several years.
guidance#509
SL
Sunny LinanalystUBS
Got it. Thank you. My second question is a quick one. And so, for you to growth by [inaudible] share, just wonder what kind of industry growth are you assuming for the major end markets, including smartphone, PC, server, automotive?
#510
#511
#512
question#513
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
Sunny, second question is TSMC. We have said we will grow — have slight growth year-on-year in U.S. dollar terms this year. Her question is what are we assuming for the end market growth in areas like smartphones, PCs, automotive and others?
#514
context#515
guidance#516
metric#517
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Well, let me answer the question, Sunny.
What do we look at in 2023, actually, we look at smartphone and PC unit, we think there's a little bit drop in terms of units. And the content will continue to increase. And for TSMC, actually, we increased our product portfolio. We also extend our market segment — available market segment to TSMC, so that's why we expect the whole industry to drop slightly and TSMC still grow slightly. Sunny, did that…
#518
target#519
target#520
operational#521
attribution#522
#523
SL
Sunny LinanalystUBS
Sorry. Yes. So, just a quick follow-up on server and automotive. So, any expectations on server units for this year? And for auto, I think October earnings call, you mentioned there could be some slowdown going to first half of the year. Have you started to see the deceleration? That's all my questions. Thank you very much.
#524
#525
question#526
question#527
observation#528
question#529
#530
#531
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So, Sunny also wants to know what is our forecast for server units, automotive units, and then we said in October, three months ago, we said automotive demand was holding steady. What is the case now?
#532
target#533
operational#534
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Well, the automotive demand continued to be very tight. I meant that — I mean demand continued to increase actually. And today, we are still probably not 100% supply enough wafers to them.
But it's improving, and we expect the automotive to — the shortage to be relaxed quickly. And the units, for the units to grow, we expect the automotive to grow this year, but that's OEM stuff.
risk#535
opportunity#536
risk#537
opportunity#538
opportunity#539
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Thank you, Sunny. Operator, can we move on to the next participant.
#540
#541
#542
SL
Sunny LinanalystUBS
Thank you very much.
#543
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you. Operator, can we move on to the next participant.
#544
#545
Q&A 6/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Sure. Our next question is come from Laura Chen with Citigroup. And Laura, please go ahead.
LC
Laura ChenanalystCitigroup
Hello. Hi. Thank you very much for taking my questions. My first question is also about the overseas expansion. Like C. C. mentioned that the overseas more advanced than 20-nanometer, we account for 20% in the longer term perspective. And also, we are expanding more in the advancement in the U.S. I am just wondering that will you also expand more like second or the advanced packaging, along with your advanced now say like 5-nanometer or 3-nanometer in Arizona as well.
#546
#547
#548
question#549
observation#550
estimate#551
observation#552
question#553
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So, Laura's first question is actually, C. C. said the 20-nanometer below capacity could be 20% and more in several years' time depending on customer demand and government support. But her question is, would we consider expanding advanced packaging overseas as well?
#554
strategy#555
target#556
strategy#557
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Well, today, we actually don't have a plan, but we do not rule out the possibility because the back end is a part of the total wafer service for our customer, okay.
strategy#558
LC
Laura ChenanalystCitigroup
Okay. Got it. And because we see that a lot of advanced now used for the high-computing PC, so along with that kind of application, we see now TSMC is very to that both 3D IC or the advanced packaging. So, I am just wondering that longer term perspective, whether that is also the direction in the U.S.
#559
#560
observation#561
question#562
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
So, I think what Laura is saying because, of course, that TSMC 3D IC solutions leading and HPC adoption is strong. So, with advanced technologies, will there be a need to build or have packaging in the U.S. as we move advanced technology portion to the U.S.?
competitive#563
strategy#564
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Alright. Laura, I just answer that we don't rule out the possibility. But today, we don't have a plan yet.
#565
strategy#566
strategy#567
LC
Laura ChenanalystCitigroup
Sure. Thank you very much. And my second question is about the gain around roadmap. Can you give us more color on the current progress? We know that we have the schedule to ramping up in 2025 versus the EUV, the high-voltage equipment will probably only ready then. Do you think that could be any like potential pushback to like a 2026 onward?
#568
#569
observation#570
question#571
concern#572
question#573
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So, Laura's second question is on the nanosheet transistor structure. She wants to know what is the progress for TSMC as we are adopting nanosheet structure at our N2. Will this be impacted or pushed out by the availability of things such as, I think you are asking high NA, Laura and things like that, correct?
#574
context#575
strategy#576
risk#577
LC
Laura ChenanalystCitigroup
Right. Thank you.
#578
#579
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Okay. Actually, our N2 technology development is on track, actually is better than what we thought. We have very good progress recently, and our risk production will be in 2024 and volume production in 2025. The schedule is not changed if we don't put it in, but so far so good, let me assure you that.
#580
strategy#581
commitment#582
operational#583
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
#584
LC
Laura ChenanalystCitigroup
Okay. Thank you very much.
#585
#586
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you, Laura. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please.
#587
#588
Q&A 7/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. And our next question has come from Rolf Bulk with New Street Research and please go ahead.
RB
Rolf BulkanalystNew Street Research
Yes.
Thank you for taking my question. I had a question on your 2023 CapEx budget and your fab build-out plan. You, earlier on in the conference call, you talked about the build-out cost of hats in the U.S. being 5x higher versus Taiwan. And in that context, I was wondering if you could talk about the share of CapEx spending that you expect to go towards that build-out versus equipment this year versus last year? Will the larger share of CapEx go to those fab build-outs and if so, how much more? Thank you.
#589
#590
question#591
concern#592
question#593
question#594
#595
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Sorry. Rolf, let me try to summarize your first question. His first question is on our CapEx in 2023, and our fab build-out plans. I believe Rolf, you are referring to fab build-out plans overseas, correct?
#596
#597
strategy#598
strategy#599
strategy#600
RB
Rolf BulkanalystNew Street Research
Yes, exactly. What I am trying to understand is if I think about your CapEx such as for this year versus last year, what share will go towards infrastructure of that build-out, what percentage will go to equipment roughly?
#601
question#602
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So, Rolf wants to know for our CapEx, how much is going to building and facilities, how much is your tools? Rolf, I want to make one correction when our CFO said that the, when you refer to 5x greater, I think our CFO was saying the construction costs are 4x to 5x higher, not the CapEx cost, but nonetheless, Rolf is asking for a breakout, of the CapEx?
#603
result#604
result#605
result#606
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Well, Rolf, we provide the breakdown of CapEx per year, advanced versus specialty technology, but we do not provide the breakdown between tools and constructions. But as I have said, in the U.S., the construction of building and facilities is probably 5x that of Taiwan. And it lasts for a few years, right.
context#607
metric#608
risk#609
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Rolf, do you have a second question? Sorry.
#610
#611
#612
RB
Rolf BulkanalystNew Street Research
Okay. Thank you very much. Yes, as the second question. Could you talk about the growth that you achieved in your Advanced Packaging segment in 2022? And what growth you are expecting in 2023? And in particular, could you talk about your SoIC products and whether interest in those products is accelerating? Thank you.
#613
#614
#615
question#616
question#617
question#618
#619
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Thank you, Rolf. So, Rolf's second question is on the advanced packaging business. What was the growth in advanced packaging last year? And what do we expect the growth to be this year? And then also more specifically in terms of our SoIC technology, what is the outlook or the momentum there?
#620
#621
strategy#622
metric#623
target#624
strategy#625
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Okay. Rolf, this is Wendell again. In 2022, our advanced packaging grew at a similar rate to our corporate rate. So, it accounted for about 7% of our total revenue in 2022. And we think that in this year, the growth will be also similar pretty — well, slightly lower than the corporate, it will be probably flattish for the back end.
#626
#627
result#628
result#629
guidance#630
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Thank you, Rolf. Alright, in the interest of…
#631
#632
#633
RB
Rolf BulkanalystNew Street Research
Thank you very much.
#634
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you. In the interest of time, maybe we will take questions from the last three participants. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please.
#635
#636
#637
Q&A 8/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Sure. The next question is come from Charles Shi with Needham. And Charles, please go ahead.
CS
Charles ShianalystNeedham
Okay. Thank you for taking my question. I just want to ask a little bit about the 20% R&D expense step-up in this year. Can you provide a little bit more detail what the incremental R&D expenses are going to be directed at? Well, for one thing, if I understand correctly, your N3 R&D team are going to move on to the N+2 [ph] node if we are seeing nanometers current end node, or is there any other incremental R&D spending this year you are expecting to be around design enablement of as packaging, specialty technology. Can you kind of give us a sense where the big step-up is coming from? Thank you.
#638
#639
question#640
estimate#641
estimate#642
estimate#643
estimate#644
#645
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. So, Charles first question is on R&D. He wants to understand or actually more details in terms of the 20% approximately year-on-year increase. What is driving — or the R&D spending going to be focused on? Is it N3? Is it N2? Is it design enablement by specific breakdown?
#646
strategy#647
result#648
strategy#649
strategy#650
strategy#651
result#652
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Charles, let me answer your question. All your comments are correct.
I mean that is because of a newer technology like N2, N1.4 and also a lot of new teams are more expensive than before. And actually, the technology complexity continued to increase exponentially. So, that's why we spend much more R&D budget. We want to continue to be number one in the world. So, we continue to invest including the geometric shrinkage, including the new transistor architecture, including the design enablement and including buying the new equipment that all is.
#653
strategy#654
result#655
result#656
context#657
result#658
competitive#659
strategy#660
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Charles, do you have a second question?
#661
#662
CS
Charles ShianalystNeedham
Yes, I do.
Maybe a second question, I want to ask about specialty technology. Obviously, you expect specialty technology to backfill your 7-nanometer fabs. I think this may be a more common knowledge inside the industry, but I recently spoke to some of your customers who are more on the analog mixed signal side. A lot of them are, I mean driving volumes more from 28-nanometer and above, and they could tell me that the benefit of going to 14-nanometer, 16-nanometer for 7-nanometer is there, but it's not large as in the past, moving node-to-node. And at the same time, the cost is much higher, and I look at your technology roadmap, specialty technology roadmap, it does seems to me that the specialty technology platforms are not as broad at the 7-nanometer if I compare with the 28-nanometer and above. I just want to get some insights from you. How do you think about the progression of specialty technology going forward, as it seems to me that it's kind of slowing down a little bit more slowing a little bit down faster for the analog mixed signal customers? Thank you.
#663
question#664
observation#665
observation#666
concern#667
concern#668
question#669
question#670
#671
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Charles' second question is on specialty technology. His observation is that the technology, specialty technology portfolio at 7-nanometer seems not as broad as prior nodes and that the — his question is, do we see the slowing scaling of analog and mixed signal areas in terms of the specialty technology development and moving down to lower nodes or more advanced nodes?
operational#672
strategy#673
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Charles, your observation is quite good. Actually, you are right. But then let me share with you a little bit more detail inside. Actually, you are right, for the analog portion or mixed signal portion, we do not need to really move into 7-nanometer or more ones now. But as time goes by, now is more and more computing functionality needed to be added into the product. Let me share with you that one thing like the WiFi, you need a really very high speed to move to the next generation and also the RF.
For those kind of things, you need a very high-performance of the computing together with low-power consumption. It is important. And if you want to get the lower power consumption, the only the leading-edge node can give you that kind of opportunities, all the footprint stays the same. Then if you want to have a higher functionality with a lower power consumption, that's where you have to move into the 7-nanometer or more end node even with the analog product. Did that answer your question?
context#674
#675
#676
strategy#677
strategy#678
strategy#679
strategy#680
strategy#681
context#682
context#683
strategy#684
CS
Charles ShianalystNeedham
Yes. So, I think this is about the reason that you feel so quite comfortable about 7-nanometer utilization will come back. You said it will mildly come back a little bit in '23, but you are still confident '24 and forward that the 7-nanometer will also be a very, very long-lasting node for you.
#685
#686
#687
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
You are right.
#688
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
#689
CS
Charles ShianalystNeedham
Alright. Thank you.
#690
#691
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you, Charles. Operator, let's move on to the last two participants.
#692
#693
Q&A 9/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. The next question is come from Brad Lin with Bank of America. And Brad, please go ahead.
BL
Brad LinanalystBank of America
Hi. Happy New Year. Thank you for taking my question. I have two questions. One is on the globalization challenge and the other on the mature nodes. So, first of all, we know TSMC is excellent in managing the supply chain and the cluster in Taiwan. However, when we now expand Japan and U.S. footprint with the last of the cluster there, would management please share with us why the strategy is to maintain the strong efficiency and the excellence that TSMC has been delivering? Thank you.
#694
#695
#696
#697
question#698
sentiment#699
question#700
#701
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Brad's first question is on our global footprint. He notes that TSMC has done a good job in terms of supply chain and cluster management. But as we go overseas to U.S. and Japan, how will we continue to ensure that we do a good job?
#702
strategy#703
strategy#704
strategy#705
ML
Mark LiuexecutiveTSMC
Alright. Okay, let me answer. I think Wendell has answered this question earlier, let me summarize a little bit.
TSMC is a service business, not in just pure production. The service depends on the trust from the customers. So, in the past, our trust and service depends on our technology leadership, manufacturing excellence and the lowest cost and quality.
But recently, the geopolitical development is evolving just in front of us. That 100% in one place cannot suffice our customers' needs. Therefore, we started the overall global footprint planning.
Now of course, the cost will be higher. And I think our team has been focused on how do we do this at the same time, keep our minimum gross margin to be 53% and above. And that is the standard that we decide how the pace of our global expansion going to be, and there are other segments in terms of the space, of course. The global expansion increased the value to our customers and the new geopolitical environment. And therefore, the pricing, how the customer can shoulder the increased cost in terms of pricing.
And of course, the — geopolitically, the semiconductor in the U.S. and Japan are all new. So, I believe we are working hard on how to reduce the cost by building up the semiconductor supply ecosystem in U.S. and Japan. And I think indeed, both governments echo are — not just us, also rather other major companies to build a similar capacity in this place to reduce the costs. So, that is the general arrangement we are planning. There is no fixed rate. Of course, the government support will be another factor. And so that is, we are cautiously step-by-step to make sure our shareholders' value still be kept.
#706
#707
#708
strategy#709
strategy#710
strategy#711
risk#712
strategy#713
commitment#714
guidance#715
guidance#716
result#717
strategy#718
risk#719
context#720
strategy#721
context#722
strategy#723
strategy#724
strategy#725
strategy#726
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Thank you, Chairman. Brad, do you have a second question?
#727
#728
BL
Brad LinanalystBank of America
Yes. Thank you very much for that juncture.
So, my second question is on the three node. And there will be no mature node is investing and generates pretty good progress with TSMC technology leadership. So, while we are expanding overseas, what is the strategy for mature node in the long run, especially China expansion baked by — also by the government subsidies? And also R&D is quite valuable for TSMC. And should we continue to allocate the R&D to mature node when maintaining group pace in testing adds [ph] and advanced packaging? Thank you.
#729
#730
observation#731
sentiment#732
question#733
observation#734
question#735
#736
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
So, Brad, second question, I think maybe to summarize this more on the mature nodes. So, he wants to better understand our strategy on the mature nodes. As we expand our manufacturing footprint and increase capacity outside of Taiwan, what is our strategy for mature nodes? Will we bring mature nodes overseas? What is the product status in China? How are we allocating R&D resources to mature nodes already specialty technology strategies, etcetera?
#737
strategy#738
strategy#739
strategy#740
strategy#741
strategy#742
strategy#743
CW
C. C. WeiCEOTSMC
Well, actually, our mature node capacity strategy is very simple. We develop differentiated specialty technology for our customer. In fact, we are working with customers and to define what they need and then what kind of technology that we need to develop. We don't add any commonly used the large technology per se, but we develop specialty and differentiated and for the long-term, structural market demand, and that's our current strategy. And because of that, of course, we put R&D's effort and resources to cooperate with our customer. And so we can generate profitability with reasonable utilization.
strategy#744
strategy#745
strategy#746
strategy#747
strategy#748
strategy#749
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay. Thank you, C. C.
#750
#751
#752
BL
Brad LinanalystBank of America
Got it. Thank you very much C. C. Thank you very much.
#753
#754
#755
#756
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Yes. Okay. Thank you. Operator, well, can we move on to the last participant, please?
#757
#758
#759
#760
Q&A 10/10
OP
Operatoroperator
Sure. Our last question is come from Mehdi Hosseini with Susquehanna International Group and please go ahead.
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International Group
Yes. Thanks for letting me ask the questions. I want to go back to gross margin. I am a little bit confused if you could clarify something. Your wafer shipment in Q4 declined and also FX actually strengthened by a little bit, which should be negative on gross margin. So your cost-cutting efforts must have been greatly exceeding these trends and I want to get a better feel for it, and I have a follow-up?
#761
#762
observation#763
question#764
observation#765
question#766
question#767
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Mehdi's first question is on gross margin. He is — he notes wafer shipments declined sequentially in the fourth quarter. The — but with the foreign exchange movement, he notes it's a negative for gross margin. So, he wants to — and then he wants to understand what is the magnitude or rate of cost improvement. Maybe our CFO can clarify some of these, particularly the FX.
context#768
metric#769
result#770
strategy#771
result#772
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Right. Our fourth quarter gross margin is 180 basis points higher than that in the third quarter. Foreign exchange rate actually went towards our favor. The NT depreciated in the fourth quarter from TWD32 in the third quarter to TWD31, TWD39, so that gave us about 140 basis points of gross margin expansion. Now, the remaining one, there are cost improvement but offset by, as we said, lower wafer utilization.
#773
result#774
opportunity#775
metric#776
result#777
strategy#778
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International Group
Okay. So, the volume helped. Now, if I just take your comment about the first half, declining 5% to 10% on a year-over-year basis, it does imply that there is a chance that revenues in Q2 would decline on a sequential basis. Would that also drive gross margin down on a sequential basis?
#779
observation#780
concern#781
question#782
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Okay.
So Mehdi's second question is then we have noted, we did not say 5% to 10%, but our first half revenue will decline mid to high-single digit year-on-year. So, he wants to know does this mean that second quarter revenue will be down sequentially? And is there — does that mean that the gross margin will go below 53% or decline into…?
#783
guidance#784
guidance#785
guidance#786
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
Okay. Right. We give you the guidance, so you can really calculate yourself on the revenue growth on the second quarter. And it's too early to talk about the gross margin in the second quarter and beyond. However, we can tell you that we work very diligently to make sure our gross — long-term gross margins of 53% and higher is achievable even in this year.
#787
#788
guidance#789
guidance#790
guidance#791
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International Group
Understood. Sure. Understood. But could it go below 53% and then rebound, so it would average to 53%?
#792
#793
#794
question#795
WH
Wendell HuangCFOTSMC
It's too early to talk about that. But as I have said, we work very diligently to make sure this long-term gross margin target of 53% and above can be achievable, including this year.
strategy#796
guidance#797
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
And we will give you the second quarter gross margin outlook in April, Mehdi, in three months, okay?
commitment#798
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSusquehanna International Group
Thank you.
#799
Closing Remarks
JS
Jeff SuirTSMC
Alright. Thank you. Okay. This concludes our Q&A session. Before we conclude today's conference, please be advised that the replay of the conference will be accessible within 30 minutes from now. The transcript will be available 24 hours from now, both of which you can find and is available through TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com. Thank you again for joining us today. We wish everyone a happy Lunar New Year and we hope you will join us again next quarter. Goodbye, and have a good day.
#800
#801
#802
#803
#804
#805
#806
#807
#808