Q4 FY2022 Earnings Call
MU · Preprocessing Report
2022-09-29
Quality
100%
59
Turns
11
Speakers
4
Sections
7
Exchanges
457
Claims

Entities by group 43

company executives 1
Sanjay Mehrotraperson
memory 5
DRAMproductDDR5productDDR4productHBM2eproductLPDRAMproduct
memory nodes 5
1-betatechnology232-layer NANDtechnology1-alphatechnology176-layer NANDtechnology1-gamma Nodetechnology
memory technology 1
NANDtechnology
sell-side analysts 3
Timothy ArcuripersonVivek AryapersonEvercore ISIcompany
business unit 2
Compute and Networking Business UnitcompanyEmbedded Business Unitcompany
storage ssds 1
SSDproduct
graphics memory 1
GDDR6Xproduct
wireless connectivity 1
5Gtechnology
storage interface 2
NVMetechnologyGen4technology
gpu models 2
GeForce RTX 4090productGeForce RTX 4080product
artificial intelligence 1
AItechnology
flash memory type 1
QLCtechnology
graphics processors 1
GPUsproduct
industrial automation 1
Factory Automationtechnology
fab equipment 1
EUV Lithography Systemsproduct
Ungrouped 14
MicroncompanyMark MurphypersonKarl AckermanpersonJoseph MoorepersonBrian ChinpersonStorage Business UnitotherC.J. MusepersonMehdi HosseinipersonCHIPS and Science ActotherPCproductUBScompanyNVIDIAcompanyUkraine WareventMobile Business Unitother
REPORTING 124PROJECTING 91POSITIONING 118EXPLANATORY 14ANALYST 43

Topics 87

revenue×35inventory×33dram×25capex×19nand×18supply×18memory×17cash×16demand×14capital×10cost×8gross margin×8operating×8tax×8ssd×6utilization×6margin×6investment×5portfolio×5market×5

Themes 290

revenue decline×7data center×6supply growth×6guidance×5under-utilization×5long-term growth×4cost reduction×4mobile×4demand growth×4recovery×4days×4q1 guidance×4process ramp×3end markets×3supply-demand balance×3cloud×3quality×3shareholder returns×3sequential decline×3repurposing×3reduction×3u.s. manufacturing site×2supply discipline×2key market mix×2graphics×2record revenue×2customer demand×2rebound×2dram industry×2second-half recovery×2demand outlook×2fiscal 2023 guidance×2year-over-year decline×2inventory reduction×2revenue growth×2revenue mix×2record high×2embedded business unit×2pricing pressure×2operating×2adjusted×2from operations×2ending balance×2memory demand×2improvement×2demand balance×2long-term trends×2underutilization charges×2flat×2supply and demand×2year-over-year growth×2technology transition costs×2production absorption×2decline×2build×2shift toward profitability×2record profitability and free cash flow×1record amount to shareholders×1client and data center ssd share gains×1new product ramp×1customer recognition×1weaker end-market conditions×1fab reductions×1cost reductions×1node launch×1node ramp×1long-term demand drivers×1dram expansion×1u.s.-asia disparity×1u.s. investment×1u.s. manufacturing expansion×1boise site capex×1boise r&d co-location×1additional wafer capacity×1staged buildout×1automotive industrial and networking×1transformation×1client demand×1unit sales outlook×1high-volume production ramp×1client nvme volume production×1pc oem qualification×1performance leadership×1gddr6x shipping×1gddr6x production×1unit volume×1smartphone adoption×1product roadmap×1market positioning×1automotive growth×1automotive slowdown×1non-memory shortages×1in-vehicle infotainment ramp×1driver-assistance adoption×1automotive demand×1long-term outlook×1industry conditions×1macro headwinds×1customer adjustments×1below consumption×1aggressive environment×1growth above demand×1high supply levels×1customer improvement×1drams industry×1nand industry×1industry headwinds×1bit rebound×1long-term strength×1long-term market growth×1growth trajectory alignment×1construction×1euv lithography×1wfe×1driving node transitions×1technology capability×1capex impact×1inventory normalization×1demand alignment×1cost optimization×1competitive cost structure×1shift to high-value solutions×1higher-profit products×1supports continued investment×1returns to shareholders×1near-term environment×1long-term model×1fab footprint×1long-term opportunities×1record annual performance×1record fiscal year×1dram mix×1dram decline×1dram volume×1dram pricing×1shipment decline×1average selling price decline×1share of total revenue×1share gain×1automotive and industrial demand×1year-over-year increase×1below guidance×1lower variable compensation×1sequential increase due to technology development spend×1fiscal 2022 full-year increase×1rd driven product and technology roadmap support×1fiscal q4 margin context×1ebitda×1margin×1quarterly expense×1annual expense×1per share decline×1per share increase×1quarterly spending×1annual spending×1free cash flow generation×1positive free cash flow×1fiscal q4 2022 buybacks×1fiscal 2022 buybacks×1capital returned including dividends×1capital returns×1balance sheet strength×1year-end level×1total balance×1inflationary pressure×1management discipline×1uncertainty and visibility×1fiscal q2 guidance×1increase×1wafer fab equipment×1first-half weighting×1negative outlook×1elevated outlook×1tax capitalization×1fixed at low profitability×1expense estimate×1dependence on operating income×1higher fiscal 2023 rate×1long-term normalized rate×1record annual result×1technology leadership×1client and data center share×1strengthened×1returned to shareholders×1competitive positioning×1growth and margins×1macroeconomic headwinds×1execution agility×1profitability mix×1long-term technology drivers×1discussion×1cutbacks across memory×1capacity reallocation for technology transitions×1efficiency×1impact×1capacity management×1capital allocation×1capital return×1liquidity pressure×1inventory and capex pressure×1negative guidance×1elevated levels and revenue pressure×1working down over time×1weighted to first half×1return to positive generation in second half×1expense and working capital reduction×1bottom×1pricing and costs×1behavior under supply changes×1production and inventory×1pricing recovery from cloud demand×1end-market relationships×1future trends×1high customer inventories×1capacity reduction×1industry growth×1growth outlook×1production trend×1demand recovery×1lowest on record×1inventory meets demand×1forward outlook×1pricing decline×1higher production costs×1quarterly guidance×1sequential growth×1offsets and inflation×1sequential improvement×1sales ratio×1dram and nand outlook×1long-term supply support×1cyclical adjustments×1slower technology cycles×1higher capital intensity×1slower technology transitions×1slower bit growth per wafer×1long-term intensity target×1cross-cycle intensity×1fungibility and repurposing×1above expectations×1quarter-end balance×1elevated levels through recovery×1supply reduction via investment cuts×1redeployment toward target days×1november quarter outlook×1depreciation labor and overhead×1fixed-cost sustainability×1significance×1level×1situation×1usability×1cash flow management×1gross margin pressure×1inventory clearance×1pricing and market conditions×1withheld outlook×1business and industry×1conservative outlook×1inflection timing×1macro trends×1short-term and long-term needs×1inventory management×1historical trends×1pc and smartphone market assumptions×1down mid-teens×1china rebound×1covid lockdown impact×1down high-single digits×15g-driven demand×1shift away from pc and smartphone markets×1toward stable markets×1competitor spending cuts×1competitive concern×1capex reduction×1capex discipline×1inventory adjustment shock×1aligning supply with demand×1rational supply management×1mix shift to higher-profit segments×1competitive improvement×1competitive parity×1capital spending focus×1business investment×1working capital×1industry actions×1bit shipments mix×1ramp delay×1engineering learning×1customer qualification×1revenue shipments delay×1

Key Metrics 92

revenue×50inventory×26supply growth×16free cash flow×12capital expenditure×10gross margin×10demand×9capital expenditures×9bit shipments×8production×6capex×6supply×6bit growth×5operating expenses×5cost reduction×4costs×4market share×4volume×4cost of sales×4unit sales×3shipments×3cagr×3profitability×3bit demand×3utilization×3taxes×3capital spending×3tax rate×3bits×3inventory days×3percentage×3ramp×2revenue mix×2bit demand growth×2eps×2average selling price×2operating income×2operating margin×2ebitda margin×2earnings per share×2cash from operations×2share repurchases×2liquidity×2tax expense×2capital intensity×2inventories×2under-utilization charges×2unit demand×2wfe spending×2bit supply growth×2cash returned to shareholders×1customers×1utilization rate×1volume production×1capacity×1cost×1wafer capacity×1bit supply share×1qualifications×1unit volume×1penetration×1purchases×1inventory adjustments×1market growth×1cash returned×1ebitda×1adjusted ebitda×1shareholder returns×1cash and investments×1debt×1r&d expense×1operating expense×1capital return×1bit share×1underutilization charges×1stock repurchases×1cash flow×1pressure×1earnings×1pricing×1demand growth×1asp×1fx×1bit growth per wafer×1working capital×1customer demand×1under-utilization rate×1technology spending×1margins×1margin×1days of inventories×1revenue shipments×1

Entities 729

Micron×357Sanjay Mehrotra×120Mark Murphy×106DRAM×21NAND×201-beta×11Timothy Arcuri×7232-layer NAND×6Karl Ackerman×6SSD×5Joseph Moore×5Brian Chin×5GDDR6X×4Vivek Arya×41-alpha×3176-layer NAND×35G×3DDR5×3Compute and Networking Business Unit×3Storage Business Unit×3Embedded Business Unit×3C.J. Muse×3Mehdi Hosseini×3CHIPS and Science Act×2DDR4×2NVMe×2PC×2UBS×2HBM2e×1AI×1Gen4×1QLC×1NVIDIA×1GeForce RTX 4090×1GeForce RTX 4080×1GPUs×1LPDRAM×1Factory Automation×1Ukraine War×1EUV Lithography Systems×11-gamma Node×1Mobile Business Unit×1Evercore ISI×1

Business Segments 68

Compute And Networking×24Mobile×11Dram×9Embedded×9Storage×8Nand×7

Sectors 83

memory×20automotive×12cloud computing×10smartphone×9data storage×8personal computing×7consumer electronics×3data center×3professional visualization×3telecommunications×2manufacturing×2networking×2industrial×2

Regions 15

U.S.×7China×3Boise×2Asia×1world×1Ukraine×1

Metadata Distributions

Sentiment
positive 141negative 91neutral 158
Temporality
backward 124forward 143current 123
Certainty
definitive 102confident 145moderate 106tentative 36speculative 1
Magnitude
major 84moderate 255minor 51
Direction
improvement 28decline 41flat 3mixed 3none 315
Time Horizon
immediate 86near_term 159medium_term 53long_term 28unspecified 64
Verifiability
quantitative 161event 20qualitative 209
Analyst Intent
probing 14challenging 3confirming 6seeking_detail 18seeking_guidance 2

Speakers

Executives
MMMark MurphyCFOSMSanjay MehrotraCEO
Analysts
BCBrian ChinanalystCMC.J. MuseanalystJMJoseph MooreanalystKAKarl AckermananalystMHMehdi HosseinianalystTATimothy ArcurianalystVAVivek Aryaanalyst
Other
FAFarhan AhmadirOPOperatoroperator

Sections

TypeLabelSpeaker
preamblePreambleFarhan Ahmad
prepared_remarksPrepared RemarksSanjay Mehrotra, Mark Murphy
qa_sessionQ&A Session
operator_signoffOperator Sign-offOperator

Q&A Exchanges 7

#AnalystFirmTurns
1
CMC.J. Muse
Evercore ISI7
2
TATimothy Arcuri
UBS9
3
KAKarl Ackerman
BNP Paribas6
4
JMJoseph Moore
Morgan Stanley8
5
MHMehdi Hosseini
SIG10
6
VAVivek Arya
Bank of America7
7
BCBrian Chin
Stifel6

Claim Taxonomy 390

REPORTING124
resultFinancial outcome for a completed period101
metricNon-financial quantitative fact10
operationalDiscrete completed event13
PROJECTING91
guidanceQuantitative expectation with number + time64
commitmentPromise with binary verifiable outcome10
targetLong-term aspirational quantitative goal17
POSITIONING118
strategyPriority, direction, or initiative65
competitiveCompany's position or advantages2
opportunityMarket condition framed as growth driver18
riskHeadwind, constraint, or uncertainty33
EXPLANATORY14
attributionWhy a specific outcome happened6
contextNon-company macro/industry fact8
FRAMING0
thesisFalsifiable belief about how the world works0
ANALYST43
questionInterrogative seeking information22
observationRestates a fact or data point11
concernFlags a risk or challenge2
estimateAnalyst's own projection or calculation7
sentimentOpinion, praise, or critique1

Transcript

Preamble
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Micron's Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2022 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's program may be recorded. And now, I'd like to introduce your host for today's program Farhan Ahmad, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
FA
Farhan AhmadirMicron Technology
Thank you, and welcome to Micron Technology's fiscal fourth quarter 2022 financial conference call. On the call with me today are Sanjay Mehrotra, our President and CEO; and Mark Murphy, our CFO. Today's call is being webcast from our Investor Relations site at investors.micron.com, including audio and slides. In addition, the press release detailing our quarterly results has been posted on the website along with the prepared remarks for this call. Today's discussion of financial results is presented on a non-GAAP financial basis unless otherwise specified. A reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures may be found on our website. We encourage you to visit our website at micron.com throughout the quarter for the most current information on the company, including information on the financial conferences, which we may be attending. You can also follow us on Twitter at MicronTech.
As a reminder, the matters we are discussing today includes forward-looking statements regarding market demand and supply, our expected results and other matters. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the statements made today. We refer you to the documents we file with the SEC, including our most recent Form 10-K and 10-Q for a discussion of the risks that may affect our future results. Although, we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results. I'll now turn the call over to Sanjay.
Prepared Remarks
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
Thank you, Farhan. Good afternoon, everyone. Micron delivered record annual revenue in fiscal 2022 with solid profitability and free cash flow, despite the challenging environment in the latter part of the year. In 2022, we ramped our industry-leading 1-alpha DRAM and 176-layer NAND nodes across our portfolio and returned a record amount of cash to shareholders. We strengthened our product portfolio significantly during the year, as evidenced by record revenue in mobile, auto, industrial and networking end markets. Our share gains in client and data center SSDs contributed to record revenue in SSDs and also in our consolidated NAND business. We also ramped new product categories like high-bandwidth HBM2e memory and GDDR6X. In addition, a record number of customers recognized Micron as the industry leader in product quality.
Our fiscal Q4 financial results were impacted by rapidly weakening consumer demand and significant customer inventory adjustments across all end markets. We are responding decisively to this weak environment, by decreasing supply growth through significant cuts to fiscal 2023 CapEx and by reducing utilization in our fabs. We are confident that the memory industry supply-demand balance will be restored, as a result of reduced industry supply growth combined with the long-term demand growth drivers for memory. Micron's technology and manufacturing leadership, deep customer relationships, diverse product portfolio and strong balance sheet put us on a solid footing to navigate this industry down cycle and position the company for strong long-term growth.
Our industry-leading 1-alpha DRAM and 176-layer NAND nodes drove strong cost reductions in fiscal 2022. In fiscal Q4, we led the industry again in introducing our 232-layer NAND, becoming the first company to enter volume production on a node with more than 200 layers. We also remain on track to begin the ramp of our 1-beta DRAM node in manufacturing by the end of calendar 2022. Both the 1-beta DRAM node and 232-layer NAND node will provide us with robust cost reduction when they ramp in high volume.
Artificial intelligence, cloud computing, electric vehicles and the ubiquitous connectivity offered by 5G are strong long-term demand drivers for memory and storage. As we have discussed previously to support memory demand in the second half of the decade and beyond, we will need to add new DRAM wafer capacity. The recently passed CHIPS and Science Act will help to reduce the memory manufacturing cost disparities that exist between the U.S. and Asia. Following passage of the CHIPS Act, Micron announced our intent to invest $40 billion through the end of the decade in leading-edge memory manufacturing in the U.S., contingent on CHIPS Act support. These investments will ultimately create tens of thousands of American jobs, strengthen U.S. supply chain resiliency and further diversify our global fab footprint. Earlier this month, we announced that we have chosen Boise as one of two leading-edge DRAM manufacturing fab sites that we are planning in the U.S. and we expect to invest approximately $15 billion at the site, through the end of the decade. The co-location of this new manufacturing facility with our existing R&D site at our headquarters in Boise, provides multiple strategic benefits including improving efficiency across both R&D and manufacturing, simplifying technology transfer and reducing time to market for leading-edge products. We will soon announce a second high-volume U.S. DRAM manufacturing site. These new fabs will fulfill our requirements for additional wafer capacity starting in the second half of the decade and beyond. We plan to build these sites in stages. Tool installation and production output will be ramped in line with industry demand growth, which is consistent with our goal to maintain stable bit supply share as well as supply discipline. Now turning to our end markets, Micron's product portfolio has become significantly stronger and contributed to our momentum in the most attractive markets.
In fiscal 2022, data center and graphics revenue grew approximately 35% and auto, industrial and networking revenue grew approximately 40%. The combined revenue mix of these important markets grew from approximately 45% of our total revenue in fiscal 2021 to 52% in fiscal 2022, putting us on track to hit our target of 62% by fiscal 2025 as outlined at our Investor Day earlier this year. This portfolio transformation will increase our exposure to the most attractive and stable profit pools in the industry. In fiscal Q4, data center revenue was down both sequentially and year-over-year, driven primarily by declines in ASP. In fiscal 2022, we set a new revenue record for our cloud revenues, which grew more than 30% year-over-year. Cloud end demand remains healthy, driven by secular growth in AI and the digital economy.
However, the data center market, including both cloud and enterprise continues to face some supply constraints that are limiting server bills and customers are reducing memory and storage inventory due to macroeconomic uncertainties. With a diverse set of products across DDR4, DDR5, graphics memory, high bandwidth memory and data center SSDs, Micron offers a wide portfolio of solutions targeting this market with industry-leading quality. Building on our recent momentum of market share gains in data center SSDs, in the first half of calendar 2022, we continue to make solid progress in ongoing qualifications of our 176-layer NVMe data center SSDs at hyperscalers and OEMs around the world.
Fiscal Q4 client revenue was down both sequentially and year-over-year, as PC unit end-demand declined and customers reduced inventory. We now forecast calendar 2022 PC unit sales to decline by an approximately mid-teens percentage year-over-year. In fiscal Q4, we began ramping 16-gigabit DDR5 in high volume production ahead of anticipated client platform launches. We also commenced volume production of Gen4 QLC NVMe client SSDs and are the only company with a full portfolio of 176-layer TLC and Gen4 QLC NVMe SSDs qualified and shipping to PC OEMs. In fiscal Q4, graphics revenue declined both sequentially and year-over-year. Micron continues to hold an excellent position as the performance leader in the graphics market. In fiscal Q4, we began shipping the industry's fastest graphics memory with 24 gigabits per second GDDR6X shipping in high-volume production. We are excited to see our proprietary GDDR6X memory featured in the recent launch of NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4090 and 4080 GPUs.
Fiscal Q4 mobile revenue declined both sequentially and year-over-year. Despite the weakness in end unit sales, we achieved two consecutive years of record mobile revenue in fiscal 2021 and 2022. We now project calendar 2022 smartphone unit volume to decline by a high-single digit percentage year-over-year. 5G continues to drive greater content per device and we project 5G penetration to exceed 50% of the smartphone unit TAM in calendar 2022. We continue to execute well on our mobile product roadmap. In fiscal Q4, 1-alpha comprised over 70% of our LPDRAM mobile bit shipments and 176-layer made up approximately 95% of our mobile NAND bit shipments.
Micron is exceptionally well positioned as a leader in automotive and industrial markets, which are attractive because of strong long-term growth and relatively stable margins. In fiscal Q4, our automotive business delivered another record revenue quarter and fiscal 2022 auto revenues grew 30% year-over-year, setting a new all-time high. In fiscal Q1, we see some slowdown in our automotive demand as our customers rebalanced DRAM and NAND inventory levels as they deal with non-memory semiconductor shortages and production challenges. However, we see continued strong growth in our second half of fiscal 2023 with volume ramp of advanced next generation, in-vehicle infotainment systems as well as the broader adoption of more advanced driver-assistance systems. We are extremely excited by the long-term prospects for memory and storage in the automotive market and expect long-term CAGR for DRAM and NAND in autos to be at about twice the rate of the overall DRAM and NAND markets. While long-term fundamentals remain strong, our industrial IoT business saw sequential and year-over-year revenue declines in fiscal Q4. Softening macroeconomic conditions have led some customers to reduce overall purchases of DRAM and NAND. Nevertheless, our long-term outlook remains strong for our Industrial business, driven by the proliferation of factory automation and digitization.
Turning to the market outlook. The memory and storage industry environment has deteriorated sharply since our last earnings call.
Calendar 2022 industry bit demand growth for DRAM is now expected to be in the low-to-mid single digit percentage range, and for NAND, slightly higher than 10%. An unprecedented confluence of events has affected overall demand including COVID-related lockdowns in China, the Ukraine War, the inflationary environment impacting consumer spending and the macroeconomic environment influencing customers' buying behavior in multiple segments. In addition, inventory adjustment at customers across all end markets are also contributing to demand weakness. These factors are depressing demand for DRAM and NAND to well below end market consumption levels. We are also seeing an extremely aggressive pricing environment.
Due to the sharp decline in near-term demand, we expect supply growth to be significantly above demand growth in calendar 2022, contributing to very high supply inventories for both DRAM and NAND. Looking ahead in calendar 2023, while macroeconomic uncertainty is high and visibility is low, we currently expect demand growth to be closer to the long-term growth rates of both DRAM and NAND bouncing back from very weak levels in calendar 2022. We expect the inventory at our customers to improve in early calendar 2023 causing demand to rebound starting from the second quarter of calendar 2023. We expect calendar 2023 industry DRAM supply to grow well below demand growth. We are modeling a mid-single digit percentage growth in DRAM industry supply in 2023, which would represent the lowest ever industry supply growth. NAND supply growth in calendar 2023 is also expected to fall below demand growth. Given the elevated supplier inventories entering calendar 2023, we expect industry profitability to remain challenging in 2023.
Following a weak first half of fiscal 2023, we expect strong revenue growth in the second half of fiscal 2023 as bit demand rebounds following substantial improvement in customer inventories. Projections for long-term demand trends remain strong across multiple end markets. We expect long-term demand bit growth to be in the mid-teens percentage slightly lower than our prior expectation of mid- to high-teens due to a moderation in the expectation of long-term PC unit sales. We continue to expect the NAND market, which benefits from elasticity to grow around 28% over the long term.
Turning to our supply. Given the change in market conditions, we have been taking immediate action to reduce our supply growth trajectory and align it to market demand. We made significant reductions to CapEx and now expect fiscal 2023 CapEx to be around $8 billion, down more than 30% year-over-year. CapEx would be lower if it were not for more than doubling our construction CapEx, year-over-year to support the supply growth required to meet the demand for the second half of this decade, as well as investment for EUV lithography systems to support 1-gamma node development. WFE CapEx will decline nearly 50% year-over-year and reflects a much slower ramp of our 1-beta DRAM and 232-layer NAND versus prior expectations. Fiscal 2023 WFE CapEx is focused on developing the technology capability of our leading nodes and new product introductions. To immediately address our inventory situation and reduced supply growth, we are reducing utilization in select areas in both DRAM and NAND. Our CapEx and utilization actions will have an adverse impact on our fiscal 2023 costs, but they are necessary to bring our supply and inventory closer to industry demand. We will aim to grow our DRAM and NAND supply in line with demand over time while continuing to optimize our costs and portfolio to improve our profitability. Before passing it over to Mark, I want to reflect on the tremendous progress that the Micron team has made over the last few years. Today, we are technology leader in both DRAM and NAND with a very competitive cost structure. We have leadership products and a strong portfolio that is transitioning towards high value solutions and we are gaining share in products that represent a more attractive profit pool in our industry. Our balance sheet is strong and allows us to invest appropriately to maintain technology, product and manufacturing leadership going forward. Our world-class quality and manufacturing expertise is recognized by our customers worldwide. We have delivered record revenues in multiple end markets in fiscal 2022, while returning record levels of cash to our shareholders. While the near-term environment is challenging, we are confident in our ability to emerge stronger and deliver financial performance in line with our long-term financial model. The long-term manufacturing investments we are making will further strengthen our diversified fab footprint and position us to capitalize on the exciting long-term opportunities ahead of us. I will now turn it over to Mark.
#1
#2
result#3
operational#4
result#5
result#6
result#7
result#8
commitment#9
metric#10
result#11
risk#12
opportunity#13
strategy#14
result#15
operational#16
commitment#17
strategy#18
opportunity#19
commitment#20
opportunity#21
guidance#22
opportunity#23
guidance#24
strategy#25
commitment#26
commitment#27
commitment#28
commitment#29
commitment#30
strategy#31
result#32
result#33
result#34
guidance#35
strategy#36
result#37
result#38
result#39
opportunity#40
risk#41
strategy#42
operational#43
result#44
guidance#45
operational#46
operational#47
operational#48
result#49
opportunity#50
operational#51
operational#52
operational#53
result#54
result#55
guidance#56
target#57
strategy#58
metric#59
metric#60
competitive#61
result#62
result#63
risk#64
risk#65
guidance#66
opportunity#67
guidance#68
result#69
risk#70
strategy#71
#72
risk#73
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Thanks, Sanjay. Our fiscal Q4 revenues came in consistent with our August 9 update, while EPS was within the original guidance range.
Fiscal Q4 capped off a strong fiscal year in which we set a record for total revenue, generated substantial free cash flow and returned $2.9 billion to shareholders. Total fiscal Q4 revenue was $6.6 billion, down 23% sequentially and down 20% year-over-year. Fiscal 2022 total revenue was a record at $30.8 billion, up 11% year-over-year.
Fiscal Q4 DRAM revenue was $4.8 billion, representing 72% of total revenue. DRAM revenue declined 23% sequentially and was down 21% year-over-year. Sequentially, bit shipments decreased by roughly 10% while ASPs declined in the low-teens percent range. For the fiscal year, DRAM revenue increased 12% year-over-year to $22.4 billion, representing 73% of total fiscal year revenue. Fiscal Q4 NAND revenue was $1.7 billion, representing 25% of Micron's total revenue. NAND revenue declined 26% sequentially and was down 14% year-over-year. Sequential bit shipments declined in the low 20% — percentage range and ASPs declined in the mid- to high-single digit percentage range. For the fiscal year, NAND revenue increased 11% year-over-year to a record $7.8 billion, representing 25% of total fiscal year revenue.
Turning to our fiscal Q4 revenue trends by business unit, revenue for the Compute and Networking Business Unit was $2.9 billion, down 25% sequentially and down 23% year-over-year. The sequential decline was primarily driven by client, while declines in server and graphics were less pronounced. Networking revenue hit a new record in fiscal 2022. Revenue for the Mobile Business Unit was approximately $1.5 billion, down 23% sequentially and down 20% year-over-year. Mobile revenue for fiscal 2022 to set a new record. Revenue for the Storage Business Unit was $891 million, down 34% sequentially and down 26% year-over-year. For the fiscal year, NAND revenue in the Storage Business Unit was its highest ever with share gains in both client and data center SSDs. Finally, revenue for the Embedded Business Unit was $1.3 billion, down 9% sequentially and down 4% year-over-year. For fiscal 2022, EBU delivered $5.2 billion of revenue, supported by revenue records in automotive and industrial markets.
The consolidated gross margin for fiscal Q4 was 40.3%, down approximately 7 percentage points sequentially. Lower pricing was the primary driver of the decline. For the fiscal year, the consolidated gross margin was 45.9%, up approximately 6 percentage points year-over-year.
Operating expenses in fiscal Q4 were just over $1 billion and below the guidance range provided on our last earnings call due in part to lower variable compensation in the quarter. Sequentially, OpEx was up around $60 million due primarily to the timing of technology development spend. For the fiscal year, operating expenses were $3.8 billion, up approximately $500 million year-over-year, driven by R&D to support our product and technology roadmaps. Fiscal Q4 operating income was $1.7 billion, resulting in an operating margin of 25%, down approximately 11 percentage points sequentially and down 12 points from the prior year. Fiscal 2022, operating income was $10.3 billion, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%, up approximately 6 percentage points from the prior year. Fiscal Q4 adjusted EBITDA was $3.6 billion, resulting in an EBITDA margin of 53.5%, down 390 basis points sequentially. For the fiscal year, adjusted EBITDA was $17.4 billion resulting in an EBITDA margin of 56.7%. Fiscal Q4 taxes were $74 million or over 4% of pre-tax income. Our fiscal 2022 total taxes were $793 million or approximately 8% of pre-tax income. Non-GAAP earnings per share in fiscal Q4 was $1.45, down from $2.59 in fiscal Q3 and $2.42 in the year ago quarter. Non-GAAP EPS was $8.35 for the fiscal year, up from $6.06 in the prior year.
Turning to cash flows and capital spending. We generated $3.8 billion in cash from operations in fiscal Q4, representing 57% of revenue. For the fiscal year, we generated $15.2 billion of cash from operations, representing 49% of revenue. Capital expenditures were $3.6 billion during the quarter and $12 billion for the fiscal year. We generated $196 million of free cash flow in fiscal Q4 and $3.2 billion for the fiscal year. Fiscal year 2022 was the sixth consecutive year of positive free cash flow for Micron. During the quarter, we completed share repurchases of $784 million or 13.2 million shares. For the fiscal year, we completed share repurchases of $2.4 billion, representing 35.4 million shares. Including our dividend payments, we returned $2.9 billion to shareholders in fiscal 2022 representing 90% of free cash flow. We remain committed to returning 100% of free cash flow across the cycle through a combination of share repurchases and dividends.
Our ending fiscal Q4 inventory was $6.7 billion and average days of inventory for the quarter was 139 days, reflecting weaker market conditions during the quarter. Our balance sheet is rock solid with strong liquidity, low leverage ratio and a net cash position. We ended fiscal 2022 at $13.6 billion of liquidity, exceeding our mid-30's percentage of revenue target. Fiscal Q4 ending cash and investments were $11.1 billion and total debt was $6.9 billion.
Now turning to our outlook for the fiscal first quarter. As a result of the demand challenges described by Sanjay earlier, we expect fiscal Q1 bit shipments and pricing to decline in both DRAM and NAND. We expect that inflationary pressure will continue to be a headwind to costs in Q1 and fiscal 2023. We remain disciplined in our expense management and have taken specific actions with more planned. As we look ahead, macroeconomic uncertainty is high and visibility is low.
In fiscal Q2, we currently expect revenue to be in a similar range as fiscal Q1 with bit shipments up, but still weak for both DRAM and NAND. We also expect a recovery in volumes and revenues in the second half of the fiscal year. We expect our inventory to increase in the fiscal first half of 2023 and days of inventory to improve as demand recovers in the second half of the fiscal year. As Sanjay mentioned, we expect our fiscal 2023 capital spending to be around $8 billion, down more than 30% year-over-year, driven by a near 50% decline in wafer fab equipment CapEx. We expect capital spending to be weighted toward the first half of the fiscal year. And as a result, we project to be over $1.5 billion negative free cash flow in the November quarter. We continue to evaluate ways to improve free cash flow, including reducing CapEx, lowering expenses and managing working capital as we respond to market conditions.
In fiscal 2023, we expect our tax rate to be elevated. Unless Congress appeals or delays recent changes to R&D deductibility, recent legislation requires that for tax purposes, we capitalize and amortize R&D expense this fiscal year. In addition based on our income mix and U.S. and foreign tax rules, our taxes become more fixed at these lower profitability levels. These factors resulted in an estimated tax of approximately $300 million at a minimum. Beyond this level the actual tax expense will depend on the level of operating income through the year. So in this lower pre-tax profitability fiscal year 2023, we expect to materially higher tax rate. Long term, as our profitability normalizes, we expect our tax rate to be in the low to mid-teens percentage range.
With all these factors in mind, our non-GAAP guidance for the fiscal Q1 is as follows: We expect revenue to be $4.25 billion, plus or minus $250 million. Gross margin to be in the range of 26% plus or minus 200 basis points and operating expenses to be $1 billion, plus or minus $25 million. Based on a share count of approximately $1.12 billion, fully diluted shares, we expect EPS to be $0.04, plus or minus $0.10.
In closing, we had many meaningful accomplishments in fiscal 2022, including delivering record revenue, achieving clear technology leadership in both DRAM and NAND, increasing share and client and data center SSDs, further strengthening our balance sheet and returning a record amount of capital to our shareholders. While the near-term environment is challenging, the Micron of today is extremely well prepared to navigate it with our competitive cost structure, strong product portfolio and rock solid balance sheet. Beyond fiscal 2023, a year starting out with a challenging set of external events, we are confident in our ability to deliver financial performance consistent with our long-term cross cycle financial model, including revenue growth of high-single digits, operating margins of 30% and free cash flow margin of over 10%. I will now turn it back to Sanjay.
guidance#74
guidance#75
risk#76
risk#77
risk#78
risk#79
risk#80
risk#81
context#82
opportunity#83
opportunity#84
opportunity#85
target#86
target#87
opportunity#88
risk#89
guidance#90
opportunity#91
opportunity#92
target#93
result#94
guidance#95
#96
strategy#97
guidance#98
result#99
result#100
result#101
guidance#102
guidance#103
result#104
risk#105
guidance#106
strategy#107
strategy#108
guidance#109
#110
strategy#111
strategy#112
strategy#113
strategy#114
strategy#115
result#116
result#117
strategy#118
guidance#119
strategy#120
strategy#121
#122
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
Thank you, Mark. The current macroeconomic environment presents an unprecedented challenge for the industry. Our rapid actions to both moderate utilization and sharply reduced CapEx illustrate our commitment to supply discipline and our focus on bringing our supply and demand back into balance. The Micron team continues to execute with agility to changing business conditions. We remain committed to our strategy of maintaining stable bit share and growing profitability with a portfolio of higher value solutions and we are confident in the long-term technology drivers for memory. New data centric applications and technologies will drive long-term memory demand on the trajectory that outpaces growth in other semiconductor categories. Our strategic investments underscore this confidence and will ensure Micron is able to capitalize on these long-term trends in the decade ahead. Thanks for joining us today. We will now open for questions.
#123
result#124
result#125
result#126
result#127
result#128
result#129
result#130
result#131
metric#132
result#133
result#134
result#135
result#136
result#137
metric#138
result#139
result#140
result#141
result#142
result#143
result#144
result#145
result#146
result#147
result#148
result#149
operational#150
result#151
result#152
result#153
result#154
attribution#155
result#156
result#157
strategy#158
result#159
result#160
strategy#161
result#162
result#163
result#164
result#165
result#166
result#167
result#168
result#169
result#170
result#171
result#172
result#173
#174
result#175
result#176
result#177
result#178
result#179
result#180
metric#181
result#182
result#183
result#184
result#185
guidance#186
result#187
metric#188
opportunity#189
result#190
result#191
result#192
#193
guidance#194
risk#195
strategy#196
risk#197
guidance#198
target#199
guidance#200
guidance#201
guidance#202
guidance#203
guidance#204
guidance#205
guidance#206
strategy#207
Q&A Session
Q&A 1/7
OP
Operatoroperator
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of C.J. Muse from Evercore ISI. Your question please.
CM
C.J. MuseanalystEvercore ISI
Yeah. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking the question. I guess first question, can you provide a little bit more detail on the magnitude of utilization cuts and how we should be taking about any underutilization charges to gross margins in November and February quarters?
guidance#208
context#209
risk#210
guidance#211
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So I think I can answer the first part and then Mark can take on the second part on the margins. So with respect to the utilization cuts, they are across NAND and DRAM and approximately in the mid-single-digit range. And of course, these cuts are for the products that have been in high inventory. And so we are cutting production of those products and using the equipment that is freed up and the space that is freed up to deploy it toward the new technology transitions. So that actually helps us with CapEx efficiency. And Mark can comment on the gross margin impact.
guidance#212
guidance#213
guidance#214
guidance#215
guidance#216
guidance#217
guidance#218
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Yeah. C.J., as you mentioned, it's going to hit us not in the first quarter, but later in the year and it would be between 1 points and 2 points of impact at this point. And of course, depending on market conditions, we would either dial that back or bringing utilization lower.
result#219
competitive#220
metric#221
result#222
result#223
strategy#224
guidance#225
CM
C.J. MuseanalystEvercore ISI
Very helpful. And as a quick follow-up, considering your strong net cash position, but your guidance for free cash flow — free cash flow negative, well, what's your near-term philosophy around buybacks?
#226
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Well, I think I'll state — really no change around, we're going to continue to focus on returning 100% of free cash flow to shareholders. We did repurchase in the first quarter and so we will opportunistically repurchase. As you pointed out C.J., we are a cash flow challenged in the first quarter.
It's been an unprecedented downturn, sharp and sudden and it has of course associated inventory builds, it's suppressed our income of course and then we've got elevated CapEx as it happened so quickly. So we expect $1.5 billion negative in the first. What we challenge in the second as well as we deal with, with elevated inventory levels and then the revenues that we guided or the bit shipments we talked about.
And then the CapEx will take time to work down. We expect it to be weighted in the first half more heavily. We do expect a volume recovery in the back half of the year and lower CapEx and inventories coming down. We do expect to return to free cash flow generation in the second half. And of course, we're working — continue to work CapEx, continue to work expenses down, working cap — working our — managing our working capital best we can to improve from this first quarter projection we have.
CM
C.J. MuseanalystEvercore ISI
Thank you.
Q&A 2/7
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you.
One moment for the next question. And our next question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS. Your question please.
TA
Timothy ArcurianalystUBS
Thanks a lot. Mark, so it sounds like you're basically calling sort of February as the bottom in the earnings. It sounds like revenue is going to be about flat, but obviously, gross margin is probably going to move lower because you said pricing is going to come down and it sounds like costs are going to go up. But I guess my question is more sort of around the behavior from these cloud customers in light of what's happening to supply. I mean DRAM supply is — as you said, up only mid-singles, next year most of that has to be coming out of inventory, so production is probably pretty flat across the industry, if not down. So these are pretty sophisticated customers, so I would think that they're going to come back to the table pretty early next year, such that you can see a pretty sharp recovery in pricing. So I'm just sort of wondering if maybe Sanjay or Mark, you can talk about sort of the behavior from these cloud customers and sort of how you think this plays out through the year as you've sort of called February as the bottom? Thanks.
#227
risk#228
result#229
strategy#230
strategy#231
result#232
strategy#233
strategy#234
strategy#235
strategy#236
#237
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So look we are not going to project future pricing trends here, but of course, we will continue to work closely with customers, not just in cloud, but customers across all end market segments. And of course, as we noted that inventories are at our customers are high, across all end market segments and they are adjusting their inventory levels including in cloud.
We will of course, most important thing is to take actions and we have taken decisive action with respect to WFE reduction by nearly 50% and reducing our supply growth. We expect the industry supply growth to be in the mid-single digit in 2023 and our supply growth will also be in line with the industry around the same for DRAM. So I think what's important is that the supply growth will be less, while the demand growth once inventory adjustments at customers have normalized or have substantially improved by our second fiscal second half, then demand will go up from customers and we expect that the DRAM demand will be in mid-teens supported by inventory, but the supply growth will be meaningfully less than demand growth and that's what will brings an improving trajectory [Technical Difficulty] of industry supply-demand balance in improving fundamentals for our business as we go through calendar year '23.
#238
TA
Timothy ArcurianalystUBS
Thanks. Can I just clarify on that, Sanjay? So, your supply will be mid-single digits, but your production is actually going to be down year-over-year, correct?
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
What we are saying is that the supply growth will be mid-single digits and — but the shipments will be in the mid-teens range in line with the demand recovery that we expect. And we are also saying that we expect industries supply growth to be also in the mid-single digit for DRAM next year. Remember, this is — this would correspond to the lowest on record supply growth for DRAM.
TA
Timothy ArcurianalystUBS
Perfect. Thank you.
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So again, the supply growth will be in the mid-single digit, inventory will be used to supply the demand, which will be higher than the supply growth. We expect the demand to be in mid-teens next year.
TA
Timothy ArcurianalystUBS
Thank you, Sanjay.
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Yeah. Maybe — maybe Tim just to maybe provide some color around the quarters. We do expect as we've laid out the bits in ASP will be down in the first quarter and they're down about the same volume, maybe down a little bit more. Costs are slightly up and DRAM and NAND and that's just a combination of volume mix inflation and then just node timing. In the second quarter, as Sanjay mentioned bits will be up, but they'll still be down year-over-year, and then as we said, the revenue range will be similar to the first quarter. And then in the second half, bits will be up sequentially, third to fourth quarter and then second half should be up in bits year-over-year.
And then cost for the full year, we would expect DRAM cost downs to be lower than the long-term average. We do get some benefit from FX, but we get some inflation and some other factors that go against us. And then NAND, cost reductions are challenged, combination of mix and inflation and just a more difficult situation there. But I think the important takeaway, first quarter we expect things to improve versus volumes and then the market better in the second half.
Q&A 3/7
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Karl Ackerman from BNP Paribas. Your question please.
KA
Karl AckermananalystBNP Paribas
Yes. Thank you. Good afternoon. I have two questions please. I guess the first question is just kind of a follow-up on CapEx. I know in the past you have described capital intensity being in the 30% to 35% range of sales. But it does appear that memory demand for calendar '22 and calendar '23 could still be below your long-term expectations of mid-teens DRAM demand and 20% to 30 % for NAND demand. And so I guess the question is, do you believe that the industries framework for CapEx needs to consider a lower terminal bit growth rate for DRAM and NAND. And I guess, what are your own views on managing long-term capital investment to support bit demand beyond fiscal '23? And I have a follow up please.
#239
#240
#241
question#242
strategy#243
metric#244
operational#245
strategy#246
attribution#247
result#248
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So our view on long-term DRAM CAGR is mid-teens and NAND CAGR approximately 28%. And we would always be managing our investments to grow our supply in line with demand.
Of course, there can be variations through the cycle, but we will overall focus on making adjustments as needed, just like you have seen adjustments now. And just keep in mind that as we look ahead at CapEx considerations, we should keep in mind that the tech transitions are getting more expensive. And of course, tech transitions are taking longer as well. So the capital intensity is higher. Tech transitions and also giving actually lower bit growth, and of course, transition to DDR5 is also contributing to lower bit growth per wafer because of DDR5 die tends to be just bigger than DDR4 die because of the specifications. So our expectation is, cross-cycle on average over long term, our CapEx would be around mid-30s that we had stated earlier, mid 30% of revenue. And of course, any given year there can be variations, but that's across cycle CapEx intensity that we would be expecting.
#249
guidance#250
strategy#251
sentiment#252
question#253
strategy#254
operational#255
risk#256
risk#257
KA
Karl AckermananalystBNP Paribas
I appreciate that, Sanjay.
Thank you. I guess for my follow-up, I was curious, what portion of your unfinished goods inventory is fungible and can be repurposed to either different end markets or different customers, even within that same end markets? Is there any clarity in terms of how you can kind of repurpose on the inventory that you have would be quite helpful? Thank you.
guidance#258
guidance#259
guidance#260
guidance#261
guidance#262
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
Yeah. I think, Karl, most of it, it's designed to the way we build it, designed to be repurposed. I mean there are some limitations, of course, but — and that, that strategy is going to — going to yield benefit here because, this downturn was so sharp and sudden, unprecedented that inventories have grown to levels over what we thought just last quarter when we had our earnings call. We ended at 139 days. We should be down around 100, 110 ideally, but we do expect an increase again in the first quarter to be over 150 days and it will be elevated through the second quarter and stay elevated, probably through the balance of the year until the recovery is meaningful and customers replenish their own inventories. But we should see it begin to decline in days over the back half. And of course, this view shape the CapEx as well to take supply out.
And — but we're confident that over time, it's good inventory. I think it's leading node primarily and as you point out, it's fungible in a sense, so we're confident that over time, we'll be able to redeploy or use that inventory and eventually get down to our target 100, 110 days.
guidance#263
strategy#264
#265
KA
Karl AckermananalystBNP Paribas
Very clear. Thank you.
Q&A 4/7
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you.
One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from the line of Joseph Moore from Morgan Stanley. Your question please.
JM
Joseph MooreanalystMorgan Stanley
Great. Thank you. I wonder if you could talk about the November quarter. At the midpoint, it looks like your cost of sales comes down almost $900 million sequentially and I think of that is being kind of depreciation labor overheads things like that. What's happening there that the sort of fixed cost elements of that are coming down so much and is that sustainable beyond the November quarter?
#266
estimate#267
estimate#268
estimate#269
concern#270
estimate#271
estimate#272
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Joe, we're — I mean we're clearly, we're running the fabs and that's being absorbed into inventories. So I think that's the short answer to your question.
estimate#273
question#274
JM
Joseph MooreanalystMorgan Stanley
Okay.
#275
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
And volumes down are down of course, so…
strategy#276
context#277
JM
Joseph MooreanalystMorgan Stanley
Yeah. Okay. So you built $1 billion worth of inventory in August quarter, almost that much and you had $4 billion cost of sales, and it's going down $3.1 billion next quarter. So I guess it is a pretty significant inventory build is what we would readout?
risk#278
operational#279
context#280
target#281
target#282
target#283
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Yeah.
I think as I answered in the last question, we're — our inventory levels are high and they're going to be higher. There'll be over 150 days we believe. And again, it's a function of this unprecedented period and we're doing what we can do, affect future supply, our future capacity being in a position to work those inventories down, they're high quality inventories. So, though — they will be usable and we're managing working capital expenses, cash flow all of them aggressively at this time.
#284
question#285
question#286
guidance#287
guidance#288
guidance#289
JM
Joseph MooreanalystMorgan Stanley
Got it. Okay. Thank you very much.
guidance#290
#291
#292
Q&A 5/7
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you.
One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from the line of Mehdi Hosseini from SIG. Your question please.
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSIG
Yes, sir. Thanks for taking my question. Mark, just a quick follow-up. You commented that February revenue could track flattish, but gross margin would at least be down 2 points, because you said the under-utilization charges would have a gross margin impact later, is that — should I assume that that will happen in February?
#309
#310
#311
#312
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Yeah. It would be — it depends on when the inventory is clear, but yes, later in the year, Mehdi. And then you've got, gross margin of course is going to be a function, it's not just that cost element, it's going to be pricing and — at that point in the market. We think volumes are recovering and we're just — we're not guiding out at that point on the rest of the P&L or the elements of the P&L.
question#313
observation#314
concern#315
question#316
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSIG
Should I spread 200 basis point of gross margin hit due to under-utilization throughout the remainder of fiscal '23?
question#317
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
Yeah, Mehdi. We're not — I mean that's going to be a headwind in the back half of the year.
#318
target#319
target#320
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSIG
Got it.
strategy#321
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
But its — but we're not guiding those quarters at this point. Just we gave a framework for how we see our business recovering along with the broader industry and what we believe will be the demand activity with our customers.
strategy#322
risk#323
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSIG
Sure. Fair. And I guess my follow-up question is also related to under-utilization rates. You've laid out a very conservative view on bit shipment for '23, especially, on the supply side, but you're also assuming demand would inflect to be after February quarter. Would there be a scenario that given actually the demand improvement is not as significant and would you be willing to take additional under-utilization like charges?
risk#324
risk#325
risk#326
risk#327
guidance#328
context#329
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So Mehdi, I would say that we would of course continue to monitor the macro trends as well as the trends in our industry and the overall business. And of course, we will be prepared to take necessary actions as appropriate to address the short term as well as the long-term needs. So we will continue to look at, just like we have moved decisively here with respect to under-utilization, looking at products that have excess inventory and leveraging that utilization — under-utilization as I said before toward — using the tools towards, deferring CapEx requirements and we'll continue to look for those opportunities as needed.
#330
#331
question#332
MH
Mehdi HosseinianalystSIG
Got it. Thank you.
question#333
#334
Q&A 6/7
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you.
One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America. Your question please.
VA
Vivek AryaanalystBank of America
Hello. Thanks for taking my question. I think Sanjay in your prepared remarks, you mentioned calendar '23 bit demand will be in line with historical trends. I'm curious, what are your assumptions about the PC and the smartphone market next year that would support bit demand growth to be in line with historical trends?
#348
#349
observation#350
observation#351
observation#352
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So with respect to PC, this year, PC — overall PC unit demand is down, as I mentioned in the script mid-teens percentage points.
And next year in calendar year '23, we expect it to be flat to slightly down. And with respect to smartphones, we certainly expect that China would be opening up and China economy would be rebounding. The COVID lockdowns have had significant impact on China demand. So overall smartphone unit sales this year, down — on a year-over-year basis down high-single digits, and we would expect that next year there would be some rebound in the smartphone unit sales.
Again, I think what's important is that the content continues to be the biggest driver of growth, 5G phones need more, memory need more storage. And as we also highlighted in our prepared remarks, of course, we are extremely focused on shifting the business away from what used to be of 55% in consumer side, including PC and smartphone in fiscal year '21 towards going to 38% by fiscal year '25. So we are really marching along well on that strategy. In fact, in fiscal year '22, we reduced that percentage to 48%. So we are increasing the mix of more attractive and more stable markets such as, of course, data center and automotive, industrial, networking, graphics and we are successfully delivering on that strategy.
question#353
strategy#354
strategy#355
#356
result#357
#358
#359
observation#360
observation#361
question#362
risk#363
VA
Vivek AryaanalystBank of America
Got it. Very helpful. And then on the range of WFE cuts for next year, are you expecting your competitors to also reduce spending by the same level? And where I'm going with that question is that at what point does it become a competitive concern, because historically most of your spending has been on technology. So if you're cutting that by 50%, at what point does that impact your competitive capabilities and impact your cost down capabilities?
risk#364
target#365
risk#366
attribution#367
strategy#368
strategy#369
strategy#370
#371
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So look, historically, the DRAM industry in recent years has been disciplined in terms of CapEx management and supply growth management.
Of course, the current environment is unprecedented with respect to the confluence of factors that we discussed, that have impacted demand, and the unprecedented level of inventory adjustments by our customers as well. We will take the necessary actions to bring our supply in line with demand. We think it is prudent. It is important to be rational in this regard. Of course, as we highlighted that this is a headwind to costs, with respect to delaying the technology transitions for our 1-beta and for our 232-layer NAND, as well as using under-utilization.
But this is the right thing to do for the business to bring supply growth in line with demand growth and this is what will restore the healthy trajectory of demand-supply balance. So this is the right thing to do and I just want to also highlight that we would, of course, maintain our share as well and that is important, but as part of that strategy, we will also continue to shift towards part of the market, as I highlighted in my prior comments, where the profit pool is greater. So we will maintain share, but we will also continue to shift towards strengthened profitability. And I think you've seen that from Micron over the course of last few years, whereas we used to be significantly behind our competitors in margins. Today, we are matching the margins, if you look at past few quarters. So I think that just shows that we remain disciplined and we remain focused on continuing to shift our portfolio towards greater pools of our profitability.
#372
#373
MM
Mark MurphyCFOMicron Technology
And then maybe just to add, Vivek is, I think we made the point that of the remaining spend we have, its focus is on technology. So to your point, we appreciate the need to invest in advancing the technology into business, so the remaining spend we have will be focused on that. And then, we still can maintain our position in the market with the inventories that we have — that we talked about in the prior question, well over 150 days as we enter the next or the next quarter and we'll have that drawn for some period of time.
VA
Vivek AryaanalystBank of America
Thank you very much.
Q&A 7/7
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you.
One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from the line of Brian Chin from Stifel. Your question please.
BC
Brian ChinanalystStifel
Great. Good afternoon, and thanks for sneaking us in to ask a question. It is related to the last question, but — what that is your assumption for industry memory WFE decline in 2023 — calendar '23, that translates into a mid-single digit increase in DRAM bit supply next year?
#374
#375
#376
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
Look, we have shared with you what we are implementing in terms of our WFE, but we certainly can't be commenting on parts of others in the industry with respect to their WFE actions. But as I pointed out, historically, the industry has been disciplined, has been prudent in terms of taking actions to manage supply growth, especially when it gets ahead of the industry demand.
question#377
#378
BC
Brian ChinanalystStifel
Okay. Yeah. I was just curious what that is, even not knowing what company plans are, but that assumption is because there must be a particular assumption that drives sort or that mid-single-digit supply growth for DRAM bits. Maybe closer to how maybe just one follow — quick follow-up, if start kick — you kick start 1-beta DRAM and 232-layer NAND in the second half of this year. Just curious how long — how many quarters do you think until that, those two products crossover 50% of bit shipments and if it's a bit slower than originally planned, how does that compare to a typical timeframe to ramp the new technologies?
guidance#379
result#380
guidance#381
strategy#382
question#383
#384
SM
Sanjay MehrotraCEOMicron Technology
So I think it's important to understand that we are delaying the ramp off 232-layer and 1-beta technologies versus our prior plans. And most of the CapEx — the $8 billion CapEx that we have talked about or the WFE CapEx that we are talking about is actually going toward preparing those technologies for engineering learning and producing the products for new — in production for customer qualifications.
In turn, these technologies will really not be contributing to the revenue shipments through our fiscal year '23 until late in fiscal year '23, they will be the primary drivers of bit growth and revenue growth and of course, cost reductions in fiscal year '24. Because we will be again relying on using the inventory to supplement our reduced supply growth to meet the uptick in demand that we expect in fiscal year '23.
guidance#385
#386
strategy#387
strategy#388
attribution#389
BC
Brian ChinanalystStifel
Okay. Fair enough. Thank you.
#390
#391
observation#392
Operator Sign-off
OP
Operatoroperator
Thank you. And this does conclude the question-and-answer session as well as today's program. Thank you ladies and gentlemen for your participation. You may now disconnect. Good day.